Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/m-binimran/design-packWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/m-binimran/design-pack/asset-qa-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00359 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00144 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00072 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00036 |
Grade A, and why
asset-qa-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You run final QA on a set of exported assets / an asset manifest before delivery. Review the manifest, the
file list (run ls/git diff), and any specs.
Check
- Format per use: SVG for logos/icons, raster optimized (WebP/AVIF/PNG/JPG), PDF/CMYK for print, MP4/WebM for video. Flag wrong-format choices.
- Sizes/densities: required @1x/@2x/@3x and responsive sizes present.
- Naming: lowercase kebab-case, descriptive, density suffix (the
asset-naming-guardhook); flag spaces/caps. - Weight: flag oversized exports that should be optimized; no big binaries committed to the repo
(
large-asset-guard). - Colour profile: sRGB for screen, CMYK + bleed/safe-area for print.
- Contrast: any text-bearing asset meets WCAG AA.
- Licensing: every stock/AI/font asset has a source + license recorded in the manifest (
license-guard).
Output
A QA checklist: item -> pass/fail -> fix. List missing densities, bad names, oversized files, missing licenses. Verdict: READY-TO-DELIVER / FIX-FIRST. Don't claim a file is correct if you can't see it - flag for a visual check.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 25 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A ae00b1326cc7
asset-qa-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository m-binimran/design-pack (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 359 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
asset-qa-reviewer compared with agents from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| asset-qa-reviewerm-binimran/design-pack | Agent | 4 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 51 | Claude Code |
| canva-executorOpenAnalystInc/10x-Canva-Skills | Agent | 7 | 8mo ago | none | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| canva-analyzerOpenAnalystInc/10x-Canva-Skills | Agent | 7 | 8mo ago | none | A | 40 | Claude Code |
| canva-plannerOpenAnalystInc/10x-Canva-Skills | Agent | 7 | 8mo ago | none | A | 60 | Claude Code |
| canvas-create-screensmicrosoft/power-platform-skills | Agent | 1.1k | today | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| nw-ux-designernWave-ai/nWave | Agent | 632 | yesterday | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code |
| designRune-kit/rune | Agent | 88 | 2mo ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |