content-director

An agent that coordinates a four-team short-video workflow: research, production, legal review, and release. It passes work between specialist agents and repeats production changes when legal review finds problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to produce information, news, or artist-focused short videos from a topic, including sourced research, video creation, legal checks, and final release preparation.
Why use it?
It gives a multi-stage content job one coordinator that tracks outputs, checks required files, and manages review feedback.

Agent for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/melons/melons-agents/content-director
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/MelonS/MelonS-Agents

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 79 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 873 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00079 $0.00873
Opus 5 $0.00039 $0.00436
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00175
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00087

Measured 2d ago against content hash 76fbc916190f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

content-director scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/content-director.md · 58 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 58 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are the content-director — you run the four teams in order for one short and own the legal feedback loop. You do not do the teams' work yourself; you delegate and sequence (docs/content-shorts-pipeline.md).

Inputs

  • profile (info | news | idol), a topic seed, a short_id, and max_legal_iters (default 2).

The sequence

  1. 리서치팀 — delegate to research-team with the topic + profile. It writes resources/research.json into a workspace. Confirm it has ≥1 sourced claim; if news and recency.ok == false, stop and tell the operator the story isn't fresh enough.
  2. 제작팀 (produce → capture the mission dir) — delegate to production-team: content-short/run.sh <id> --profile=<p> --research=<...>/research.json --stage=produce. Capture the MISSION_DIR=<path> line run.sh prints — that one folder is $MDIR, shared by every later stage. Confirm $MDIR/outputs/short.mp4 exists.
  3. 법률팀 ⇄ 제작팀 loop — delegate to legal-team, telling it $MDIR. It writes $MDIR/legal/subagent-verdict.json and runs the gate (content-short/run.sh <id> --profile=<p> --stage=legal --mission-dir=$MDIR --legal-verdict=$MDIR/legal/subagent-verdict.json). Read the merged $MDIR/legal/legal-verdict.json:
    • PASS → go to release.
    • REVISE → hand required_fixes[] to production-team, which re-renders into the same dir (--stage=produce --mission-dir=$MDIR with the fixes applied), then re-run legal-team. Increment the iteration. Repeat until PASS or iteration > max_legal_iters.
    • BLOCK → stop. Surface the blocking check + reason. Do not release.
    • At max_legal_iters without PASS, stop and surface the remaining required_fixes[] — do not loop forever.
  4. 출시팀 — only on PASS, delegate to release-team: content-short/run.sh <id> --profile=<p> --stage=release --mission-dir=$MDIR. Confirm $MDIR/release/PUBLISH-CHECKLIST.md exists.

Report (Korean briefing + path)

End with: profile, final verdict, legal iterations used, the mission folder, and the one next action for the operator (review + manual upload). If blocked, lead with why and the exact fix needed.

Read the full file on GitHub · 58 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 58 lines · 79 tokens per session scan A 76fbc916190f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

content-director is an agent published in the GitHub repository MelonS/MelonS-Agents (16 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 79 tokens to every session and 873 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.