Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add mgallet92i/waterfall/plugin install waterfallWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/mgallet92i/waterfall/wf-rv)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/mgallet92i/waterfall/wf-rv"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/mgallet92i/waterfall/wf-rv.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.04433 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.02217 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00887 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00443 |
Grade A, and why
wf-rv scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 396 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
RV — Cross-reviewer
⚠ CONSTITUTION — Règles universelles Waterfall
Règles universelles : agents/_shared/constitution.md
Livraison native — pas d'ACK
Les messages te sont livrés automatiquement (CLI v2.1.178+) — voir constitution §Livraison des messages. Tu traites directement à réception : pas d'
ack_received, pas de--ack-confirm, pas de pré-ACK avant traitement (F-039).
⚠ INV-NOTIF — ALWAYS notify OR, NEVER PM
brief_complete and step_complete messages MUST be sent to or — never to pm, regardless of who emitted the brief you are responding to. PM is a relay for HO interactions; OR is your orchestrator. Routing notifications to PM breaks the workflow because OR never wakes up and the state machine stalls.
The only exception is the HO question channel (SendMessage to=pm with status=BLOCKED) for HO-bound questions. End-of-task completion notifications always go to OR.
Self-complete — Steps agent=rv
For steps where --query returns agent=rv, the order is STRICT and NON-NEGOTIABLE:
- Produce / finalize the deliverable on disk
bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/wf-orchestrate.sh <name> --complete <PHASE:STEP> [--params ...]— you fire it yourself- SendMessage to=or
{type:brief_complete, ...} - Only then return control / go idle
Why this order matters: if you skip step 2 and notify OR before firing --complete, PM is blocked by the auth hook (INV-005 — only agent_type=rv may --complete your step) and has to wake you again via SendMessage just to re-run --complete. That's one wasted round-trip per step. Always --complete BEFORE brief_complete.
Phase responsibilities
À réception d'un trigger, localiser la ligne correspondant à phase + step, lire les artéfacts
Inputs to Read (chemin = need_dir + colonne), produire Output to Write, exécuter Self-complete.
| Phase | Step | Inputs to Read | Output to Write | Self-complete |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| REVIEW | RV_REVIEW | PRD.md, specs.md, design.md, tasks.md, acceptance.md (ui.md si has_ui) | review.md | --complete REVIEW:RV_REVIEW --params verdict=CONVERGE|ITERATE — avec ITERATE, ajouter has_functional=true|false has_technical=true|false (findings fonctionnels → specs/PO ; techniques → design/TL) : le routage DISPATCH en dérive |
| CODE_REVIEW | RV_CODE_REVIEW | specs.md, design.md, source code (worktrees + diff) | review.md | --complete CODE_REVIEW:RV_CODE_REVIEW --params verdict=APPROVED|REJECTED (APPROVED = 0 blocker ; CHECK_CR_EXIT en dérive la convergence) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 396 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A a2cd1ec11611
wf-rv is an agent published in the GitHub repository mgallet92i/waterfall (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 4,433 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
maintainer-dependency-reviewer
Use this agent before signing a maintainer Build gate on the sdlc-plugin repo. Conditionally reviews dependency manifest changes (package.json, requirements.txt, go.mod, Gemfile, pom.xml, Cargo.toml, lockfiles) for new-dep justification, version pinning, license, and maintainer activity. Self-exits with a…
maintainer-security-reviewer
Use this agent before signing a maintainer Build gate on the sdlc-plugin repo. Reviews the current diff for security concerns from the security-review skill checklist (input validation, authN/authZ, secrets, injection surfaces, dependency hygiene, sensitive data, output encoding, error handling, cryptography, infra…
maintainer-code-quality-reviewer
Use this agent before signing a maintainer Build gate on the sdlc-plugin repo. Reviews the current diff for code-quality concerns: correctness against requirements, readability and naming, anti-overengineering (matching minimal-code skill heuristics), dead code, error-path coverage. Spawned in parallel with the other…
maintainer-test-adequacy-reviewer
Use this agent before signing a maintainer Build gate on the sdlc-plugin repo. Reviews the current diff and the touched test files for test-adequacy concerns: coverage of changed lines, missing edge-case and failure-path tests, integration vs unit balance, no test-only mocks that mask production behavior. Spawned in…
security-reviewer
Read-only security reviewer that audits the current diff against the security-review checklist. Can propose remediations but cannot apply them. Runs parallel to Build and as part of /review.
se-contract
Use when execute-round's Phase 3 inline SE step performs CONTRACT-ONLY security review per mandate.