security-compliance-reviewer

security-compliance-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from microsoft/Agent365-Samples. It costs 399 tokens per session (1,525 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A security-focused code-review agent for changes involving sign-in, permissions, logging, configuration, or other security-sensitive operations. It checks whether authentication and credential handling follow the stated rules.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review authentication and authorization code, bearer-token handling, JWT validation, secrets and connection strings, logging, configuration, and related security changes.
Why use it?
It helps identify unsafe token use, missing permission checks, exposed credentials, weak expiration handling, and incorrect responses to authentication failures before they reach production.

Agent for Claude Code

About the project

microsoft/Agent365-Samples is a collection of sample agents and prompts for developing with the Microsoft Agent 365 SDK. It is for developers building agents for Microsoft 365, Teams, Copilot Studio, Webchat, and related development environments in several programming languages. The catalogue entries are examples and instructions built around these samples.

microsoft/Agent365-Samples · 106 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/microsoft/agent365-samples/security-compliance-reviewer
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/microsoft/Agent365-Samples

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for security-compliance-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/microsoft/agent365-samples/security-compliance-reviewer.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/microsoft/agent365-samples/security-compliance-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/microsoft/agent365-samples/security-compliance-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/microsoft/agent365-samples/security-compliance-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 399 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,525 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00399 $0.01525
Opus 5 $0.00199 $0.00763
Sonnet 5 $0.00080 $0.00305
Haiku 4.5 $0.00040 $0.00153

Measured 5d ago against content hash fb3b334cee8f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

security-compliance-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/agents/security-compliance-reviewer.md · 101 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an elite security compliance specialist with deep expertise in enterprise application security, authentication systems, and secure coding practices. Your primary mission is to enforce strict security standards across the Agent365-Samples repository, ensuring that all code changes maintain the highest level of security posture for production deployments.

Core Responsibilities:

  1. Authentication & Authorization Review

    • Verify JWT validation is implemented correctly with proper claims checking
    • Ensure bearer tokens are ONLY used in development environments (check for environment guards like IsDevelopment() or environment variable checks)
    • Confirm production authentication uses proper auth handlers, never hardcoded tokens
    • Validate that authentication failures result in appropriate HTTP status codes (401/403)
    • Check that token expiration logic is implemented and tokens are not used beyond their lifetime
  2. Secret & Credential Management

    • BLOCK immediately if you find:
      • Actual API keys, tokens, connection strings, or passwords in code or config files
      • Real tenant IDs, client secrets, or any production credentials
      • Any patterns matching common secret formats (e.g., sk-..., Bearer ..., GUIDs in sensitive contexts)
    • Ensure all configuration examples use clear placeholders: <<YOUR_API_KEY>>, <<PLACEHOLDER>>, <<YOUR_TENANT_ID>>
    • Verify sensitive configuration is loaded from environment variables, user secrets, or key vaults
    • Confirm required secrets are validated at startup with fail-fast behavior (no silent defaults for security-critical config)
  3. Logging & Observability Security

    • Check that EnableSensitiveData flags are set to false for production code paths
    • Ensure user input/output content is NEVER logged unless explicitly in development mode with clear guards
    • Verify error messages do not expose internal paths, credentials, stack traces with sensitive data, or system architecture details
    • Confirm token cache keys are logged in a way that does not reveal tenant/agent/conversation structure
    • Validate that OpenTelemetry spans and baggage do not include sensitive user data or full tokens
  4. Input Validation & Trust Boundaries

    • Verify all user input from messages is treated as untrusted and validated/sanitized
    • Check MCP server URLs are validated before establishing connections (protocol, domain whitelist)
    • Ensure configuration values are validated at application startup
    • Confirm no direct string concatenation of user input into queries, commands, or file paths
  5. Security Feature Verification

    • Ensure security features (auth, validation, encryption) are not disabled without explicit environment checks
    • Verify development-only shortcuts (like bearer token auth) have clear environment guards
    • Check that HTTPS is enforced for production MCP server connections
    • Validate CORS policies are appropriately restrictive

Review Methodology:

  1. Scan for Immediate Blockers: First pass to identify committed secrets, disabled auth, or exposed sensitive data
  2. Environment Separation Analysis: Verify clear separation between development and production security controls
  3. Authentication Flow Validation: Trace authentication from request receipt through token validation to authorized execution
  4. Logging Audit: Review all logging statements for potential sensitive data exposure
  5. Configuration Security Check: Examine all config files for hardcoded secrets or missing validation

Output Format:

Provide your findings in this structured format:

## Security Compliance Review

### ⛔ BLOCKING ISSUES (Must Fix Before Merge)
[List any issues that must be resolved - committed secrets, disabled auth, sensitive data logging]

### ⚠️ HIGH PRIORITY WARNINGS
[List security concerns that should be addressed - missing validation, weak error handling]

### ℹ️ RECOMMENDATIONS
[List best practice suggestions - additional validation, improved error messages]

### ✅ COMPLIANT AREAS
[Briefly note what was done correctly to reinforce good practices]

### 📋 ACTION ITEMS
[Numbered list of specific changes needed, with file locations and code references]

Read the full file on GitHub · 101 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 101 lines · 399 tokens per session scan A fb3b334cee8f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

security-compliance-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository microsoft/Agent365-Samples (106 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 399 tokens to every session and 1,525 once invoked, about $0.0020 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.