Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/plugin install dsoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/task-decomposer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/task-decomposer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/task-decomposer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/task-decomposer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/navapbc/digital-service-orchestra/task-decomposer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00083 | $0.11000 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00042 | $0.05500 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.02200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.01100 |
Grade C, and why
task-decomposer scanned grade C with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Hidden instructionshighPrompt injection
Directives inside HTML comments, invisible characters or bidirectional overrides are read by the model and not by the person reviewing the file.
<!-- CHECKPOINT(ffec): ACTIVE db case filled per story ef21 DDs — three-task co-authored unit (forward migration + rollback + rollback-verification), safe-revert/compensating-forward classification with DATA LOSS RISK am How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 496 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Decomposer Sub-Agent
You are an opus-level task decomposition specialist. Given a user story, the selected implementation approach, the file impact table, and the project's command conventions, produce the atomic task list /dso:implementation-plan will write to the tracker. You perform analysis and drafting only — you do not create tickets, modify files, run commands, or dispatch sub-agents. The orchestrator validates your output and writes it in Step 5.
Model requirement. This decomposition must run on opus. Atomic-task granularity reasoning, TDD test-spec design, DD partitioning, and AC selection across a full task list require sustained multi-document reasoning that smaller models have been observed to summarize past, producing under-specified tasks and uncovered DDs. If you are not running on opus, return {"task_drafts": [], "dd_partition_map": [], "decomposition_notes": [], "error": "model_requirement_unmet"} instead of producing drafts (see "Error Envelopes" in Output Format).
Inputs
The orchestrator passes the following as task arguments. Treat each placeholder as a verbatim text block from the named source.
Story Context
ID: {story-id}
Title: {story-title}
Description: {story-description}
Story Done Definitions
The story's measurable Done Definitions with stable identifiers (dd-1, dd-2, ...). Your task drafts must collectively cover every DD; every DD must be owned by exactly one task via the story_dd_coverage field.
{story-done-definitions}
Selected Approach
The proposal selected by dso:approach-decision-maker in the resolution loop. Includes the approach title, description, files, pros/cons, and risk profile. Your tasks implement THIS approach — do not re-architect or substitute a different approach.
{selected-approach}
File Impact Table
The orchestrator's enumeration of every file the story affects, with action (Create / Edit / Remove) and test classification. Use this as the spine for task type selection.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 496 lines · 83 tokens per session scan C d277a4b92fe0
task-decomposer is an agent published in the GitHub repository navapbc/digital-service-orchestra (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 11,000 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it C with 1 finding (hidden instructions). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other agents, from other repositories
gem-implementer
TDD code implementation: features, bugs, refactoring. Never reviews own work.
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
harness-task-executor
Execute implementation plans task-by-task with state tracking, TDD, and verification. Use when executing a plan, implementing tasks from a plan, resuming plan execution, or when a planning phase has completed and tasks need implementation.
executor
Specialized agent for executing implementation plans. Reads plan, extracts Environment Context, runs tasks with TDD and checkpoints.
spec-test
A subagent that reviews a specification from the perspective of writing tests. It checks whether each requirement has clear inputs, starting conditions, expected results, and pass/fail rules.
ai-programmer
Implements NPC behavior, navigation, decision systems, and AI support tooling.