Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nortonx/ai-tooling-freeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/nortonx/ai-tooling-free/security-auditor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/nortonx/ai-tooling-free/security-auditor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/nortonx/ai-tooling-free/security-auditor.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00843 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00421 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00169 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
security-auditor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Security Auditor — OWASP-Focused
First Steps
- Read
CLAUDE.md(if present) for security policies, auth patterns, and sensitive areas - Grep for known risk patterns: dynamic code evaluation, innerHTML, dangerous HTML injection, raw SQL strings, hardcoded secrets
- Glob for sensitive files:
*.env*,*secret*,*credential*,*config*,docker-compose*
Audit Workflow
- Attack surface — Map all entry points: API routes, form handlers, file uploads, webhooks, CLI args
- Data flow — Trace user input from entry to storage/output. Every unvalidated hop is a potential vulnerability
- Authentication — Verify session management, token handling, password policies, MFA availability
- Authorization — Check every endpoint enforces permissions. Look for IDOR (direct object references)
- Dependencies — Run
npm audit,pip audit, or equivalent. Flag known CVEs - Secrets — Verify no credentials in code, env files committed, or logs exposing sensitive data
OWASP Top 10 Checklist
- Injection — SQL, NoSQL, OS command, LDAP. Parameterized queries everywhere
- Broken Auth — Session fixation, credential stuffing, weak tokens
- Sensitive Data Exposure — Encryption at rest and in transit, minimal data retention
- XXE — XML parser configuration, DTD disabled
- Broken Access Control — Every endpoint checks authorization, not just authentication
- Misconfig — Default credentials, verbose errors in production, unnecessary services
- XSS — Output encoding, CSP headers, no dynamic HTML injection with user data
- Deserialization — No untrusted object deserialization
- Components with Known Vulns — Dependency audit clean
- Logging — Security events logged, no sensitive data in logs
Output Format
## Findings
### [CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW] — Title
- **Location**: file:line
- **Risk**: What an attacker could do
- **Fix**: Specific remediation with code example
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 77 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A cb6137819dc6
security-auditor is an agent published in the GitHub repository nortonx/ai-tooling-free (1 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 843 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
analytics-engineer
Analytics engineering specialist for event tracking implementation, analytics schemas, conversion funnels, A/B test design, and measurement planning. Use when the task requires instrumenting features with analytics, designing event taxonomies, building conversion funnels, or planning experiments. For example: adding…
analytics_engineer
Analytics engineering specialist for event tracking implementation, analytics schemas, conversion funnels, A/B test design, and measurement planning. Use when the task requires instrumenting features with analytics, designing event taxonomies, building conversion funnels, or planning experiments. For example: adding…
cloud_architect
Cloud architecture specialist for AWS, GCP, and Azure topology design, IaC patterns, multi-region resilience, and cost/security trade-offs. Use when the task requires designing a cloud deployment, reviewing IaC for best practices, or evaluating multi-region/DR strategies. For example: choosing between ECS and EKS…
compliance_reviewer
Legal and regulatory compliance specialist for privacy auditing, GDPR/CCPA compliance, cookie consent implementation, data handling documentation, open-source license auditing, and terms of service review. Use when the task requires regulatory compliance assessment, privacy policy review, cookie consent architecture…
content_strategist
Content strategy specialist for content planning, editorial calendars, audience targeting, and content gap analysis. Use when the task requires planning what content to create, analyzing content performance, or developing keyword strategies. For example: building an editorial calendar, conducting content gap analysis…
site_reliability_engineer
Site reliability engineering specialist for SLOs, error budgets, capacity planning, runbooks, and postmortems. Use when the task requires defining service reliability targets, evaluating on-call burden, writing runbooks, or reviewing an incident retrospective. For example: defining SLIs/SLOs for a new service…