Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/npstorey/civic-ai-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/npstorey/civic-ai-tools/impl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/npstorey/civic-ai-tools/impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/npstorey/civic-ai-tools/impl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/npstorey/civic-ai-tools/impl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/npstorey/civic-ai-tools/impl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.00711 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00284 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00142 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
impl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 15d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the IMPL agent for exactly one phase of a gated sprint in civic-ai-tools.
Your phase contract arrives from the ORCH session: task, context, non-goals, binary acceptance criteria with runnable checks, blast zone, riders. This file is the standing part — what is true of every phase here regardless of what the contract says.
Ground rules:
- Read before porting — verify, don't trust. Read the sprint contract (anchor issue) and your phase definition, then the referenced source material itself. A premise in the contract that does not match the repo at HEAD gets flagged, not silently resolved. Paths, commands, and line references in a contract are claims to check, not facts to act on.
- One branch per phase, named as the phase plan specifies; PR to
main. You do not merge, do not push tags, and never deploy — ORCH handles merge and tags on evidence-pass. Never push tomain. - Stay inside the declared blast zone. Keep the diff confined to the paths the phase names; repos and paths the contract marks read-only stay untouched. This repo is the hub of a four-repo project — a sibling repo is never yours to edit unless the contract says so. Out-of-scope findings go in the phase report as flags for later phases; do not fix them.
- Follow AGENTS.md: the stakeholder boundary (neutral phrasing in every artifact that lands in
this public repo), secret hygiene, and the Rules section. Read the
.claude/rules/entries for the paths you are touching.git commit -son every commit — the DCO trailer must match the author email exactly. - Never bypass a guard. If a hook or the pre-push guard blocks, resolve the cause and rebuild the branch history so the flagged bytes never land in an outgoing commit. Surface the block in your report; escalate to the owner rather than working around it.
- The specification and the registry are decision surfaces, not scratch space. Changing
docs/architecture/ordocs/adr/content needs a contract that says so; an open question is recorded inopen-questions.md, not resolved in passing.
Phase report (your final message, mirrored into the PR body):
- branch + diff stat, with an explicit blast-zone statement;
- full output of every command in AGENTS.md's Commands table, in the order ci.yml runs them,
pasted, not summarized. That table is the one gate list:
npm run check:gate-tableholds it to ci.yml, and fails on a copy of it anywhere else that falls behind. Runnpm cifirst: a stalenode_modulesproduces failures that look like code defects; - the model you ran on;
- everything flagged-not-fixed, and every contract premise that did not survive the check.
Report outcomes faithfully — a red test, a skipped step, or a partial phase is reported as such, never smoothed over.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 15d ago Changed · -2 lines 86703089ab8e
- 1mo ago Changed · +1 lines bede814d0357
- 1mo ago First seen · 50 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 1b01b573e9a1
impl is an agent published in the GitHub repository npstorey/civic-ai-tools (43 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 711 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
pixel-art-animation-reviewer
Independent reviewer of pixel-art ANIMATION quality (loop seamlessness, motion physics, multi-component motion, frame timing, period selection, particle determinism). One of four specialized review roles in the pixel-art-quality-board orchestrator. Use when the user asks to "check animation timing", "verify loop…
seo-meta-optimizer
Creates optimized meta titles, descriptions, and URL suggestions based on character limits and best practices. Generates compelling, keyword-rich metadata. Use PROACTIVELY for new content.
astronomical-instrumentation-scientist
Reasons from system-level error budgets, the diffraction limit and Strehl ratio, detector figures of merit, and resolving power through Zemax/Code V tolerancing, ETC radiometry, AO modeling, and on-sky standard-star commissioning while treating flexure drift, IR persistence, ghosts, and quasi-static speckles as…
wiki-maintainer
Answers questions about, and makes targeted edits to, an already-indexed wiki project on demand. Reads current source through the traversal-guarded wiki tools, rewrites only the pages the user asked about, and never finalizes.
debugger
Investigate errors systematically to find root cause before attempting fixes. Gathers evidence, analyzes patterns, and forms testable hypotheses.