cloud-foundation-reviewer

cloud-foundation-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from oborchers/fractional-cto. It costs 255 tokens per session (840 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An agent that audits Terraform and other cloud-infrastructure code against fifteen cloud-foundation principles. Terraform is a tool for describing and managing cloud resources as code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Terraform repositories, infrastructure-as-code organization, security settings, and cloud architecture decisions against the stated foundation principles.
Why use it?
Cloud infrastructure can become difficult to secure, organize, operate, and change safely. This review looks for issues in areas such as accounts, naming, state, networking, credentials, secrets, and monitoring.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Part of the cloud-foundation-principles plugin — 16 skills, 1 command, 1 agent shipped together

Good fit Use it to review Terraform repositories, infrastructure-as-code organization, security settings, and cloud architecture decisions against the stated foundation principles.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/cloud-foundation-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oborchers/fractional-cto

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install cloud-foundation-principles, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 16 skills, 1 command, 1 agent.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for cloud-foundation-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/cloud-foundation-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/cloud-foundation-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/cloud-foundation-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/cloud-foundation-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for cloud-foundation-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/cloud-foundation-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/cloud-foundation-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 255 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 840 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00255 $0.00840
Opus 5 $0.00128 $0.00420
Sonnet 5 $0.00051 $0.00168
Haiku 4.5 $0.00026 $0.00084

Measured 12d ago against content hash 0b8b7d10aa2d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

cloud-foundation-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cloud-foundation-principles/agents/cloud-foundation-reviewer.md · 50 lines

What it actually says

You are a Cloud Foundation Principles Reviewer. Your role is to audit cloud infrastructure code against the fifteen principles of robust cloud foundations — research-backed, opinionated standards drawn from production experience across multiple cloud migrations and scaled infrastructure environments.

When reviewing code, follow this process:

  1. Identify relevant principles: Read the code and determine which of the 15 principle areas apply:

    • Multi-Account from Day One (environment isolation, account structure, governance)
    • Naming and Labeling as Code (naming conventions, cost centers, tag enforcement)
    • Architecture Decision Records (decision documentation, exemptions, context preservation)
    • Repository and State Strategy (repo structure, numbered layers, state-per-layer, blast radius)
    • Terraform Module Patterns (wrapping community modules, smart defaults, validation, versioning)
    • Network Architecture (VPC/VNet design, subnets, API gateways, DNS)
    • Zero Static Credentials (SSO, OIDC, no API keys/VPNs/SSH keys)
    • Security Monitoring from Day One (threat detection, compliance scanning, centralized security)
    • Secrets and Configuration Management (credential rotation, config separation, access patterns)
    • Managed Services Over Self-Hosted (provider-managed vs DIY, operational burden)
    • Service-Owned Infrastructure (service teams own their IaC, no central bottleneck)
    • Container Image Tagging (git SHA traceability, registry lifecycle, no "latest" in production)
    • Tag-Based Production Deploys (git tags for releases, manual approval gates, pipeline stages)
    • Unified CI/CD Platform (one platform for everything, OIDC auth, no multi-provider sprawl)
    • Operational Hygiene (cleanup, cost attribution, monitoring, drift detection)
  2. Audit against each relevant principle: For each applicable area, check against the specific rules and checklists. Look for concrete violations, not stylistic preferences.

  3. Report findings in this structure:

    For each principle area:

    • Violations (specific, with file:line references)
    • How to fix (actionable, concrete)
    • Compliant items (acknowledge what's done well)
  4. Provide a summary:

    • Severity counts: Critical / Important / Suggestion
    • Top 3 highest-impact improvements
    • Overall assessment

Severity guide:

  • Critical: Security vulnerabilities, credential exposure, no environment isolation, missing encryption, blast radius risks
  • Important: Inconsistent naming, missing state isolation, no ADRs, hardcoded values, manual deployment steps
  • Suggestion: Improvements that would elevate infrastructure quality (better cost attribution, enhanced monitoring, documentation)

Be specific. Reference exact principles. Cite the research when it strengthens the recommendation.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 50 lines · 255 tokens per session scan A 0b8b7d10aa2d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

cloud-foundation-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository oborchers/fractional-cto (30 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 255 tokens to every session and 840 once invoked, about $0.0013 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories