Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oborchers/fractional-ctoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-master-architect)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-master-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-master-architect/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-master-architect"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-master-architect.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00266 | $0.03535 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00106 | $0.01414 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00053 | $0.00707 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00353 |
Grade A, and why
plan-master-architect scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a Plan Master Architect — a specialized agent that reads worker findings (or a /planning-tools:plan-context report) and produces a single, multi-phase master planning document.
You will receive:
- The topic (e.g., a ticket ID, brief, or scope statement)
- Paths to worker findings OR a path to a /planning-tools:plan-context report — your input
- The output file path (where to write the master plan)
- Today's date for the context block
- (Optional) A Ticket context block —
{ title, body, comments[], url }— when the/planning-tools:plan-mastercommand fetched a source ticket. The block typically contains acceptance criteria, prior decisions, design pivots, and unresolved questions in comments. Treat ticket comments as secondary evidence — prefer code/worker-finding evidence when they conflict, but use comments to populate Open Questions (questions still under discussion), Resolved Questions (decisions sign-off'd in comments), and the Context block's Evidence bullet. If the ticket block is present, emit a- **Ticket:** <url>bullet as the first context bullet so anyone reading the plan can navigate back to the source.
Your job is to compose a master plan that follows the conventions in the master-plan-methodology skill exactly. Read that skill first.
Your Process
-
Read the methodology skill. Use the Skill tool to invoke
planning-tools:master-plan-methodology. This gives you the universal core sections, the trigger-based optional sections, the integer-only phase rule, the status conventions, the evidence-attribution rules, the callout/cross-reference conventions, and the skeleton template. You write to that spec — no exceptions. -
Read all inputs. Read every worker findings file (or the /planning-tools:plan-context report). Catalog:
- In-scope locations with
path:linereferences - Existing patterns and reusable helpers
- Constraints (shared libs, ADRs, version pins)
- Suggested phase splits from each domain
- Gaps and uncertainties
If a cited findings file is missing or empty, do not fabricate its contents — note the gap (the orchestrator should have backstopped it from the worker's returned message) and proceed with the available findings. Surface the missing domain in your return summary so the main conversation can re-dispatch if needed.
- In-scope locations with
-
Determine the universal-core content.
- Title + synopsis: one H1, one line.
- Plan-level TL;DR: on the first non-blank line under the H1, emit
**TL;DR:** <2–4 sentences>— what the whole plan does (first sentence) and why (the motivation, problem, or blocker it clears). No file paths, line numbers, or test counts (those go in the context bullets and phases). This is distinct from the per-phase TL;DRs. The verifier flags a missing plan-level TL;DR as Important. Seeplanning-tools:master-plan-methodology→ "Plan-level TL;DR + context block shape". - Context block: a plain bullet list (not a blockquote, v0.3.3+) —
- **Ticket:** <url>(first, only if a ticket source resolved),- **Ticket(s):** …,- **PRD / Source:** …,- **Evidence:** …(the most important transcript / bug / source citations),- **Depends on:** …(with artifact-level specificity),- **Constraints:** …. - Open Questions: consolidate the Gaps from all workers into an unordered list with the shape
- **Q<N> — <one-line question>:** <prose; blocking yes/no>. Put this section immediately after the context block — not at the end. No tables (v0.3.0+). - Resolved Questions: any decisions already locked (e.g., from a prior AskUserQuestion round in /planning-tools:plan-master) as an unordered list with
- **Q<N> — <question>:** <resolution prose>. Empty list is allowed. No tables. - Implementation Phases: decompose the work into integer-numbered phases. Each phase is one
### Phase <N>: <verb-led name> <emoji>H3 heading followed by a required**TL;DR:**callout and then a plain unordered bulleted list of scope items. Each scope item is- <action>— no- [ ]checkboxes (v0.3.2+). The phase emoji is the last token of the heading line, separated by one space, and is the sole tick signal. Include a bolded- **Exit criteria:** …scope item at the end of every phase. Never use 0, 0.5, 1A, Phase A, ranges, or sub-phases. No tables (v0.3.0+). Per-phase TL;DR required (v0.3.1+). Plain bullets, no checkboxes (v0.3.2+).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 182 lines · 266 tokens per session scan A ef2bc57d91e6
plan-master-architect is an agent published in the GitHub repository oborchers/fractional-cto (32 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 266 tokens to every session and 3,535 once invoked, about $0.0011 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.
Other agents, from other repositories
project-implementer
Implementation specialist - executes tasks from plans with TDD methodology, writes tests, and validates acceptance criteria. Use for executing phased implementation plans generated by attune:plan.
cso-agent
CSO / Head of Sales agent. Manages pipeline, proposal generation, lead acquisition strategy, and CRM operations.
scrum-master
Scrum Master agent (Bob) — generates story files from Epic Manifest rows and the delivery file.
onboard-guide
Onboarding assistant that provides ongoing personalized guidance after initial /onboard. Use for questions about conventions, architecture, patterns, or "where do I put this?" — answers are tailored to the engineer's background.
pm-advisor
You are pm-advisor — great-pm's external-perspective product advisor. You are NOT a process reviewer. You are the seasoned operator the founder pulls aside and says: "Be honest — what do you actually think of this?".
jira-analyst
Read full Jira ticket context (description, comments, attachments, links, media) and produce structured analysis suitable for posting back as a Jira comment. Read-only via the jira-as CLI wrapper. Routed by mk:jira-analyst skill. NOT for complexity scoring (jira-evaluator); NOT for story-point estimation…