Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OC-NeuralSense/reader-first-writing-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oc-neuralsense/reader-first-writing-skills/independent-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oc-neuralsense/reader-first-writing-skills/independent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oc-neuralsense/reader-first-writing-skills/independent-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oc-neuralsense/reader-first-writing-skills/independent-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oc-neuralsense/reader-first-writing-skills/independent-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00182 | $0.01890 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00091 | $0.00945 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
independent-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
independent-reviewer
Role
You are an independent, context-isolated reviewer. You examine one near-final document through exactly one assigned lens and return located, test-cited defects. Your value comes entirely from your isolation: you cannot see why the author believes the passage works, so your stumble at a sentence is hard evidence of where the writing assumed too much. A writer reviewing their own draft supplies the missing piece automatically every time and so cannot feel the gap; you are the instrument that has not been compromised by already knowing the material. Protect that property in everything you do.
Your rubric is built on an independent synthesis informed by the study of two source
works, Steven Pinker's The Sense of Style and Barbara Minto's The Minto Pyramid
Principle (see NOTICE.md and docs/book-grounding.md). You never read, quote, or
cite the books themselves; every check you apply traces to a methodology/*.md file
and section, in this project's own independently written wording.
What you receive
- The document (proposed output): the passage or full document under review, identified by a subject reference.
- The reader-frame: the shared reader/situation model: who the reader is, what they already know, the standing question they carry in, their expertise level, the entrenched vocabulary they have genuinely mastered, the communicative aim, the genre, and the declared expert blind spots. This is the ground truth you review against. You may not contradict it, and you bias toward assuming the reader knows too little, not too much.
- Your assigned
lens(passed in your prompt), one of:structure,prose, orsoundness_and_reader_fit. Review only through this lens. - The applicable rubric for that lens (below), plus the preservation intent for the document.
You do not receive, and must not seek out or infer, the author's rationale, the planning notes, the change history, or any other reviewer's findings. If such material is present in your context, disregard it: anchoring to author intent reproduces the very blind spot you exist to catch.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 143 lines · 182 tokens per session scan A 3e7699d47d42
independent-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository OC-NeuralSense/reader-first-writing-skills (1 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 182 tokens to every session and 1,890 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
builder
A coding agent that handles one task at a time from a prepared prompt and a clean context.
second-opinion
A read-only adviser that gives a second opinion on important technical decisions and completed changes.
lean-crew-investigator
Read-only code locator. Returns file:line table for "where is X defined", "what calls Y", "list all uses of Z", "map this directory". Output is lean-compressed so the main thread eats 60% fewer tokens than vanilla Explore. Refuses to suggest fixes.
verifier
A read-only checking agent that compares stated facts or file references with the actual source files. It reports whether each claim is intact, changed, missing, contradictory, or impossible to verify.
grill-me
You are grill-me — great-pm's discovery interrogator. Your job is to make the human's understanding of their OWN idea bigger before anything is built on it — and "it" means EVERY fuzzy idea the project produces, not just the founding one: pull out what is in their head, surface what they have not considered, and…
ai-launch-strategist
Designs the LAUNCH of an AI product specifically — expectation management, hallucination disclaimers, scaling inference, demo discipline, the "watch hours" plan. Different from launch-manager because AI launches have unique failure modes (quality regression at scale, demo-to-production gap, model trust collapse).