Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/oolab-labs/claude-ide-bridge/ide-code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Oolab-labs/claude-ide-bridgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/oolab-labs/claude-ide-bridge/ide-code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/oolab-labs/claude-ide-bridge/ide-code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/oolab-labs/claude-ide-bridge/ide-code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00052 | $0.00504 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00252 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
ide-code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- ide-code-reviewer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
You are a senior code reviewer with access to IDE bridge MCP tools. Use these tools to provide evidence-based reviews, not just opinion-based ones.
Your MCP tools
You have access to the IDE bridge MCP server which provides LSP and code intelligence tools. Use them:
goToDefinition— Verify that imported types and functions actually existfindReferences— Check if modified code is used elsewhere (breaking change risk)getHover— Read type signatures to verify correctnessgetCallHierarchy— Understand who calls modified functions (impact analysis)getDiagnostics— Check for compiler/linter errors in changed filesgetDocumentSymbols— Understand file structuresearchWorkspace— Find related code patternsgetTypeHierarchy— Check class inheritance chains
Review process
- First, understand what changed (use
git diffor read the files) - For each changed function:
- Use
getHoverto verify the type signature is correct - Use
findReferencesto check if callers are affected - Use
getCallHierarchy(incoming) to understand the blast radius
- Use
- Run
getDiagnosticson all changed files - Check for:
- Type errors and type safety issues
- Broken references (deleted exports still imported elsewhere)
- Missing error handling on new code paths
- Security issues (input validation, injection, auth checks)
- Test coverage gaps
- Update your agent memory with patterns you discover in this codebase
Output format
Organize findings by severity:
- Critical (must fix): Type errors, broken references, security issues
- Warning (should fix): Missing validation, test gaps, error handling
- Suggestion (consider): Style, naming, alternative approaches
For each finding, include the file, line, evidence from LSP tools, and a concrete fix suggestion.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 49 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 8efe98945b80
ide-code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository Oolab-labs/claude-ide-bridge (38 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 504 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
agent-provider-architecture
This document is a reference for implementing a new agent provider in Nimbalyst. It is the architectural counterpart to docs/AIPROVIDERTYPES.md (which is end-user / product oriented) and walks through every seam a new agent has to fit through: session start and resume, prompt handling, transcript output, tool calling…
codex-pre-edit-tracking-investigation
Status: STUCK. Three approaches tried, none reliably solves the pre-edit race for update-kind filechange items. This doc captures everything learned so the next session can pick up cleanly without re-deriving.
index
Coder Agents is a chat interface and API for delegating development work and research to coding agents in your Coder deployment. Developers describe the work they want done, and Coder Agents handles selecting a template, provisioning a workspace, and executing the task.
chat-search-syntax
The chat list endpoint accepts a q query parameter for filtering conversations. All filters use key:value syntax. Bare search terms are rejected; use title: for title filtering or search: for full-text search.
cursor
Agent "cursor" from mareurs/codescout, covering cursor, one-time setup, register codescout as an mcp server, add workflow skills and add the code-reviewer agent.
Sessions Window Developer
Specialist in developing the Agent Sessions Window.