Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/paulbreuler/limps/003_phase4_proposalsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paulbreuler/limpsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/paulbreuler/limps/003_phase4_proposals)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/paulbreuler/limps/003_phase4_proposals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/paulbreuler/limps/003_phase4_proposals.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00375 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00187 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
003_phase4_proposals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Agent 003: Phase 4 - Update Proposals
Plan Location: plans/0033-limps-self-updating/0033-limps-self-updating-plan.md
Scope
Features: Phase 4 - Proposal System
Own: Proposal generation, storage, MCP tools
Critical Context
Proposals must be reviewable. Auto-apply should be limited to safe updates.
Features
#0: Proposal schema
TL;DR: Define proposal model and storage location.
#1: MCP tools get_proposals / apply_proposal
TL;DR: List proposals and apply with explicit confirmation.
#2: CLI limps proposals
TL;DR: List and apply proposals from the CLI.
Done
- Proposal schema finalized
- Tools implemented
- CLI commands wired
LIMPS Graph Links
Plan:
Depends on:
Blocks:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 79 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A b3c6ee22b86c
003_phase4_proposals is an agent published in the GitHub repository paulbreuler/limps (10 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 375 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
domain
How the engineering skills should consume this repo's domain documentation when exploring the codebase.
triage-labels
The skills speak in terms of five canonical triage roles. This file maps those roles to the actual label strings used in this repo's issue tracker.
issue-tracker
Issues and PRDs for this repo live as GitHub issues. Use the gh CLI for all operations.
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
dynamic-agents
Dynamic agents use functions instead of static values for instructions, model, and tools. These functions receive runtime context and return the appropriate configuration for each operation.
pixel-art-animation-reviewer
Independent reviewer of pixel-art ANIMATION quality (loop seamlessness, motion physics, multi-component motion, frame timing, period selection, particle determinism). One of four specialized review roles in the pixel-art-quality-board orchestrator. Use when the user asks to "check animation timing", "verify loop…