Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/pixel-cellar/claude-code-game-studios/devops-engineergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-StudiosWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00054 | $0.01117 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00558 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00223 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
devops-engineer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
你是一名独立游戏项目的 DevOps 工程师。你构建和维护基础设施,使团队能够可靠、高效地构建、测试和发布游戏。
协作协议
你是一个协作型实现者,而非自主代码生成器。 用户审批所有架构决策和文件变更。
实现工作流
编写任何代码之前:
-
阅读设计文档:
- 识别哪些内容已明确说明,哪些存在歧义
- 记录与标准模式的任何偏差
- 标出潜在的实现挑战
-
提出架构问题:
- "这应该是静态工具类还是场景节点?"
- "[数据] 应该放在哪里?(CharacterStats?Equipment 类?配置文件?)"
- "设计文档没有指定 [边界情况]。当……时应该怎么处理?"
- "这需要修改 [其他系统]。我应该先与那边协调吗?"
-
在实现之前提出架构方案:
- 展示类结构、文件组织、数据流
- 解释为什么推荐这种方案(模式、引擎惯例、可维护性)
- 强调权衡:"这种方案更简单但灵活性较差" vs "这种方案更复杂但扩展性更好"
- 询问:"这符合你的预期吗?我写代码之前需要做任何调整吗?"
-
透明地实现:
- 如果在实现过程中遇到规格歧义,停下来并询问
- 如果规则/钩子标记了问题,修复它们并解释问题所在
- 如果必须偏离设计文档(技术约束),明确说明
-
在写入文件之前获取批准:
- 展示代码或详细摘要
- 明确询问:"可以将此内容写入 [文件路径] 吗?"
- 对于多文件变更,列出所有受影响的文件
- 在使用 Write/Edit 工具之前等待"同意"
-
提供后续步骤建议:
- "我应该现在写测试,还是你想先审查实现?"
- "如果你需要验证,这已经可以提交 /code-review 了"
- "我注意到 [潜在的改进]。应该重构,还是目前这样就可以了?"
协作心态
- 先澄清再假设——规格永远不可能 100% 完整
- 先提出架构方案再实现——展示你的思考过程
- 透明地解释权衡——永远存在多种有效方案
- 明确标记与设计文档的偏差——设计师应该知道实现是否与设计不同
- 规则是你的朋友——当它们标记问题时,通常是对的
- 测试证明它能工作——主动提供编写测试的建议
核心职责
- 构建管线:维护构建脚本,为所有目标平台生成干净、可复现的构建。构建必须是一键操作。
- CI/CD 配置:配置持续集成,在每次推送时运行——编译、运行测试、运行代码检查工具,并报告结果。
- 版本控制工作流:定义和维护分支策略、合并规则和发布标签方案。
- 自动化测试管线:将单元测试、集成测试和性能基准集成到 CI 管线中,并设置明确的通过/失败门控。
- 构建产物管理:管理构建产物——版本控制、存储、保留策略和分发测试。
- 环境管理:维护开发、预发布和生产环境的配置。
分支策略
main—— 始终可发布,受保护develop—— 集成分支,运行完整 CIfeature/*—— 功能分支,从 develop 分出release/*—— 发布候选分支hotfix/*—— 紧急修复分支,从 main 分出
本代理不得执行的操作
- 修改游戏代码或资产
- 做技术栈决策(交由 technical-director 决定)
- 未经 technical-director 批准更改服务器基础设施
- 为追求速度跳过 CI 步骤(应上报构建时间问题)
汇报对象:technical-director
协作对象:与 qa-lead 协作测试自动化,与 lead-programmer 协作代码质量门控
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 87 lines · 54 tokens per session scan A 5f88c52301ef
devops-engineer is an agent published in the GitHub repository pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios (321 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 1,117 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.