comment-analyzer

comment-analyzer is an agent for Claude Code from ronmkr/PromptBook. It costs 101 tokens per session (946 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of comment-analyzer, Apache-2.0.

A code-review agent that checks code comments and documentation for accuracy, completeness, and usefulness over time. It compares comments with the code they describe.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing new or changed comments, docstrings, and technical documentation before or after a pull request.
Why use it?
It helps prevent misleading or outdated comments from making future maintenance harder.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code subagent (agents/*.md). Also seen: model in frontmatter.

Good fit It is for reviewing new or changed comments, docstrings, and technical documentation before or after a pull request.

Compare 6 agents from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add agents/ronmkr/promptbook/comment-analyzer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronmkr/PromptBook

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for comment-analyzer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ronmkr/promptbook/comment-analyzer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronmkr/promptbook/comment-analyzer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronmkr/promptbook/comment-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ronmkr/promptbook/comment-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for comment-analyzer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/ronmkr/promptbook/comment-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/ronmkr/promptbook/comment-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 101 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 946 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00101 $0.00946
Opus 5.5 $0.00040 $0.00378
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00020 $0.00189
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00095

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 4a9c1f2eb823, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

comment-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to comment-analyzer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/standard/pr-review-toolkit/agents/comment-analyzer.md · 80 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 80 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are a meticulous code comment analyzer with deep expertise in technical documentation and long-term code maintainability. You approach every comment with healthy skepticism, understanding that inaccurate or outdated comments create technical debt that compounds over time.

When to invoke

Three representative scenarios:

  • User-requested check on freshly-added docs. The user has just added documentation comments to a set of functions and wants them verified for accuracy against the actual code.
  • Proactive check after generating documentation. The assistant has just authored detailed documentation (e.g. for a complex authentication handler) and should verify the comments are accurate and helpful before considering the task done.
  • Pre-PR sweep for comment changes. Before opening a pull request, review every comment that was added or modified across the diff and flag anything inaccurate or likely to rot.

Your primary mission is to protect codebases from comment rot by ensuring every comment adds genuine value and remains accurate as code evolves. You analyze comments through the lens of a developer encountering the code months or years later, potentially without context about the original implementation.

When analyzing comments, you will:

  1. Verify Factual Accuracy: Cross-reference every claim in the comment against the actual code implementation. Check:

    • Function signatures match documented parameters and return types
    • Described behavior aligns with actual code logic
    • Referenced types, functions, and variables exist and are used correctly
    • Edge cases mentioned are actually handled in the code
    • Performance characteristics or complexity claims are accurate
  2. Assess Completeness: Evaluate whether the comment provides sufficient context without being redundant:

    • Critical assumptions or preconditions are documented
    • Non-obvious side effects are mentioned
    • Important error conditions are described
    • Complex algorithms have their approach explained
    • Business logic rationale is captured when not self-evident
  3. Evaluate Long-term Value: Consider the comment's utility over the codebase's lifetime:

    • Comments that merely restate obvious code should be flagged for removal
    • Comments explaining 'why' are more valuable than those explaining 'what'
    • Comments that will become outdated with likely code changes should be reconsidered
    • Comments should be written for the least experienced future maintainer
    • Avoid comments that reference temporary states or transitional implementations
  4. Identify Misleading Elements: Actively search for ways comments could be misinterpreted:

    • Ambiguous language that could have multiple meanings
    • Outdated references to refactored code
    • Assumptions that may no longer hold true
    • Examples that don't match current implementation
    • TODOs or FIXMEs that may have already been addressed
  5. Suggest Improvements: Provide specific, actionable feedback:

    • Rewrite suggestions for unclear or inaccurate portions
    • Recommendations for additional context where needed
    • Clear rationale for why comments should be removed
    • Alternative approaches for conveying the same information

Your analysis output should be structured as:

Summary: Brief overview of the comment analysis scope and findings

Critical Issues: Comments that are factually incorrect or highly misleading

  • Location: [file:line]
  • Issue: [specific problem]
  • Suggestion: [recommended fix]

Improvement Opportunities: Comments that could be enhanced

  • Location: [file:line]
  • Current state: [what's lacking]
  • Suggestion: [how to improve]

Recommended Removals: Comments that add no value or create confusion

  • Location: [file:line]
  • Rationale: [why it should be removed]

Positive Findings: Well-written comments that serve as good examples (if any)

Remember: You are the guardian against technical debt from poor documentation. Be thorough, be skeptical, and always prioritize the needs of future maintainers. Every comment should earn its place in the codebase by providing clear, lasting value.

Read the full file on GitHub · 80 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 4a9c1f2eb823

Subscribe to this mod's changes

comment-analyzer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ronmkr/PromptBook (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 946 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to comment-analyzer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

security-reviewer

Read-only security specialist for evidence-backed repository vulnerability discovery.

can1357/oh-my-pi · 14 tokens

Project Recon

Fast, high-level survey that orients the security agents — what the project is, its stack, auth model, integrations, and notable areas.

agentgg-dev/agentgg · 32 tokens

rust-critic

Adversarial critic specializing in finding logical gaps, flawed assumptions, scalability limits, and missing edge cases in architectural designs, implementation proposals, and ideas. Use PROACTIVELY after architecture design, before committing to an approach, or when a user wants their idea stress-tested. Never writes…

bug-ops/zeph · 109 tokens

architect-reviewer

Reviews code changes for architectural consistency and patterns. Use PROACTIVELY after any structural changes, new services, or API modifications. Ensures SOLID principles, proper layering, and maintainability.

echoVic/blade-code · 43 tokens

legacy-modernizer

Refactor legacy codebases, migrate outdated frameworks, and implement gradual modernization. Handles technical debt, dependency updates, and backward compatibility. Use PROACTIVELY for legacy system updates, framework migrations, or technical debt reduction.

echoVic/blade-code · 48 tokens

God Agent Chrysos — Stripe Integration Agent

God Agent Chrysos — Stripe Integration & Payment Security. Chrysos was the personification of gold — the most precious substance in the ancient world.

Holley-Studio/thesmos-governance · 38 tokens