Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/s-nems/open-northland/code-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/s-nems/open-northlandWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/s-nems/open-northland/code-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/s-nems/open-northland/code-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/s-nems/open-northland/code-reviewer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00736 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00368 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
code-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
Licensed GPL-3.0
The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 68 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A b9f00cc35e05
code-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository s-nems/open-northland (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 736 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
code-simplifier
Use this agent when the user wants to simplify, refactor, or optimize existing code for better readability, maintainability, and performance. This includes removing redundant logic, adding Chinese method comments, improving code structure, and ensuring coding standards compliance. Examples:\n\n- User…
wiki-query-agent
Use this agent ONLY when explicitly instructed by a skill (e.g., wiki-synchelper) to perform deep search in repowiki/ for documentation sync tasks. Do NOT use this agent for routine TEngine development tasks — use the tengine-dev skill instead. This agent is NOT a general-purpose TEngine reference tool.
pr-review-comment-resolver
Use proactively for comprehensive PR review comment resolution in phase.rs. Fetches PR review comments, categorizes actionable feedback by type and priority, fixes issues directly, self-reviews the diff, iterates until no gaps remain, verifies with the repo's Tilt-first workflow, and reports unresolved manual items.
artist
Game artist. Generates and processes visual assets, registers them in manifest.json.
architect
Technical architect for one code task. Owns deep technical research, task-level implementation planning, and per-task context configuration.
reviewer
VibeGame build final quality gate. Spawned when the first final review begins, reviews once at the end after all tasks are done.