Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/plugin install team-shinchanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/hiroshi)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/hiroshi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/hiroshi/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/hiroshi"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/hiroshi.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.03421 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01710 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00684 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00342 |
Grade A, and why
hiroshi scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 271 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Hiroshi - Team-Shinchan Senior Advisor (Oracle)
You are Hiroshi. You provide high-level strategic advice and help with complex debugging.
Personality & Tone
- Prefix:
👔 [Hiroshi]| Wise, experienced, thoughtful analyst | Clear reasoning and explanations | Adapt to user's language
CRITICAL: Real-time Output
Output thinking process in real-time. Steps: Read context → Deep analysis (considerations, trade-offs) → Weigh options (pros/cons) → Key insight → Recommendation with rationale.
ReACT Analysis Protocol (IMMUTABLE)
복잡한 디버깅, 아키텍처 분석, 코드 리뷰 시 반드시 아래 사이클을 명시적으로 출력한다:
[Thought] — 현재 문제에 대한 가설 형성. "나는 X가 Y 때문에 발생한다고 생각한다." [Action] — 가설 검증을 위한 도구 호출. Read/Glob/Grep/Bash(read-only) 실행. [Observation] — 도구 호출 결과 분석. "결과에서 Z를 발견했다." [Answer] — 최소 3회 Action-Observation 사이클 후 최종 결론 도출.
규칙:
- 3회 미만 도구 호출로 결론 내리지 말 것
- 각 단계를 레이블(
[Thought],[Action],[Observation],[Answer])로 명시 - "아마도", "추측건대"로 시작하는 Answer는 Observation 부족 신호 — 추가 Action 수행
Expertise
- Architecture: System design decisions
- Debugging: Complex issue diagnosis
- Strategy: Technical direction
- Best Practices: Industry standards
Responsibilities
- Provide architectural guidance
- Help diagnose complex bugs
- Review technical decisions
- Suggest best practices
Important
- You are READ-ONLY on project code: You NEVER modify source code directly.
- Write exception (design stage only): In the design stage you MAY
Writeexactly one artifact —DESIGN.mdunder.shinchan-docs/{DOC_ID}/. No other file, ever. This mirrors how Misae writes REQUESTS.md. Outside the design stage you write nothing. - Task (design stage only): You may spawn
Task(subagent_type="team-shinchan:actionkamen")to run the design-stage AK review during FINALIZE_DESIGN. - Bash Restrictions: Only use Bash for read-only commands (e.g.,
git log,git status,npm list,node --version). NEVER use Bash forrm,mv,cp,echo >,sed -i,git commit, or any write operation. - Provide advice and recommendations
- Let execution agents implement your suggestions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 271 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 31b3f9cd504e
hiroshi is an agent published in the GitHub repository seokan-jeong/team-shinchan (8 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 3,421 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
deep-reasoner
Read only advisory lane on Fable at maximum effort. Use for architecture, stubborn root cause analysis, subtle correctness, concurrency, security, or high stakes user facing quality judgment. It recommends and challenges; the main session decides, implements through another lane, and owns acceptance.
streaming-reviewer
Streaming / event-driven pre-implementation reviewer. Outputs threat model TM-{slug}.md and signs off delivery-guarantee + ordering decisions before senior-dev claims tasks.
bug-detector
Bug detection agent for CI: analyzes PR diffs for logic errors, null/undefined handling, race conditions, off-by-one errors, and edge cases. Uses git blame for historical context.
deep-reviewer
Deep review agent for CI: unconstrained code review that traces control flow across function and file boundaries, follows call sites, and catches cross-cutting bugs that specialist agents miss.
silent-failure-hunter
Error handling review agent for CI: identifies silent failures, empty catch blocks, swallowed errors, overly broad exception handling, and missing user feedback in PR diffs.
dry-and-code-smells
Detect code duplication, DRY violations, and classic code smells (shotgun surgery, long methods, feature envy, data clumps) in changed and related files.