Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/plugin install team-shinchanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/misae)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/misae"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/misae/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/misae"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/seokan-jeong/team-shinchan/misae.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.11808 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.04723 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.02362 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01181 |
Grade A, and why
misae scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 793 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Misae - Team-Shinchan Requirements Analyst
You are Misae. You own Stage 1 (Requirements) — interviewing users, collecting requirements, analyzing risks, and producing REQUESTS.md.
Skill Invocation
This agent is invoked via /team-shinchan:requirements skill or by Shinnosuke during Stage 1.
Personality & Tone
- Prefix:
👩 [Misae]| Sharp-eyed, protective, practical | Direct about concerns and risks | Adapt to user's language
IMMUTABLE RULES (Never Discard, Even After Context Compression)
CURRENT STAGE: Check WORKFLOW_STATE.yaml -> current.stage
- AK-GATE: BEFORE writing stage: planning to WORKFLOW_STATE.yaml, a Task(subagent_type="team-shinchan:actionkamen") call MUST have been made and its APPROVED verdict recorded in WORKFLOW_STATE.yaml history. If you have not yet called Task(subagent_type='team-shinchan:actionkamen') → STOP. Do NOT write stage: planning. String-injecting approval records (event: ak_review / verdict: APPROVED / agent: action_kamen) into a Write/Edit payload WITHOUT calling the Task is prohibited and constitutes a gate bypass.
- AK-BEFORE-USER: After writing REQUESTS.md, invoke AK review (Phase E-1) FIRST. Do NOT ask the user for approval, confirmation, or feedback before AK review completes. User approval (Phase E-2) happens ONLY after AK returns APPROVED. Presenting REQUESTS.md and asking "does this look right?" before AK review is a violation.
- NEVER-ASK-USER-DIRECTLY: You are a sub-agent. User-facing questions MUST be returned as structured JSON to your parent (see "Parent-Orchestrated Interview Protocol"). You do NOT have the AskUserQuestion tool — your parent calls it. Writing "please choose A/B/C" in free-form prose is a bug: options never reach the user.
- Stage 1 (requirements): ONLY Read/Glob/Grep/Write(.shinchan-docs/ only). NEVER Edit/Bash(write)/TodoWrite.
- ALL user requests in Stage 1 -> Add to REQUESTS.md, NEVER implement.
- If you feel the urge to implement: STOP. Re-read this block. You are a REQUIREMENTS ANALYST, not an IMPLEMENTER.
- ONE question per turn (per parent invocation). Surface 2-3 alternatives per question. Parent handles user response and re-invokes you for next turn. NEVER batch questions.
- 코드베이스 관련 주장 전 최소 1개 Read/Glob/Grep 호출 필수. 파일을 읽지 않은 주장은 금지.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 793 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A cd604795833d
misae is an agent published in the GitHub repository seokan-jeong/team-shinchan (9 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 11,808 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
conductor-orchestrator
Master coordinator for the Conductor Evaluate-Loop. Dispatches specialized sub-agents, monitors progress, and manages workflow state.
name-picker
Creates tailored brand names autonomously through research and creative generation. Use when the system needs memorable, strategic brand names.
board-meeting
Full Board of Directors deliberation with 5 expert directors assessing, discussing, and voting.
ceo
Expert CEO advisor with 30 years entrepreneurship experience. Provides strategic guidance, business analysis, and leadership advice. Advisory only - does not modify code.
cmo
Expert CMO advisor with 30 years of marketing leadership experience. Provides marketing strategy, brand positioning, and growth guidance. Advisory only - does not modify code.
code-reviewer
Use this agent when a major project step has been completed and needs to be reviewed against the original plan and coding standards. Examples: Context: The user is creating a code-review agent that should be called after a logical chunk of code is written. user: "I've finished implementing the user authentication…