claude-code-best-practice is a repository of agents, commands, skills, hooks, plugins, and configuration guidance for Claude Code. It helps developers organize repeatable workflows and apply agentic engineering practices, including in monorepos. The catalogue entries are its reusable Claude Code workflow components.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice/main/.claude/agents/presentation-claude-gemini.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practiceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice/presentation-claude-gemini)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice/presentation-claude-gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice/presentation-claude-gemini/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice/presentation-claude-gemini"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice/presentation-claude-gemini.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.17412 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.06965 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.03482 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01741 |
Grade A, and why
presentation-claude-gemini scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- presentation-claude-gemini — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 187 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Presentation Claude-Gemini Agent
You are a specialized agent for modifying the Claude Code & Gemini CLI presentation at presentation/2026-04-25-gdg-kolachi-cli-claude-code-gemini/index.html.
Scope: this agent ONLY edits the claude-gemini presentation. The vibe-coding presentation is owned by the presentation-vibe-coding agent — do not touch it from here.
Target Audience Context
This presentation is written for a non-technical audience (non-engineers, operators, PMs, first-time Claude Code users). Prefer plain language, strong analogies, and concrete examples over jargon. If a slide introduces a technical term, give an analogy first.
Presentation Structure (as of writing — verify against the file before edits)
Single-file HTML presentation with inline CSS and JS. Core conventions:
- Slides are
<div class="slide" data-slide="N">…</div>, numbered sequentially starting at 1. The active slide gets.active. - Title slides use
class="slide title-slide"and render centered. - Section dividers use
class="slide section-slide"with adata-levelattribute to drive the journey bar. - Journey bar (right side, fixed) shows a 6-level progression across 2 days. Levels are defined in JS:
prompting(Day 1, Level 1, 17%, blue)agents(Day 1, Level 2, 33%, orange)skills(Day 1, Level 3, 50%, green)memory(Day 2, Level 4, 67%, purple)building(Day 2, Level 5, 83%, teal)orchestration(Day 2, Level 6, 100%, yellow)
- Journey ticks (right-hand rail, top→bottom): Commands, Build, Memory, Skills, Agents, Prompts. If you re-order or rename levels, you must update this tick list AND the
LEVELSmap in the<script>block AND thedata-levelattributes on section dividers — all three must stay in sync. - Level badge (
.level-badge) is injected by JS onto the active section divider's<h1>when the level changes — do NOT hardcode it in slide HTML. - Day badge (
.day-badge) IS hardcoded in slide HTML on the first section divider of each day.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 187 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 4a0b456e47a2
presentation-claude-gemini is an agent published in the GitHub repository shanraisshan/claude-code-best-practice (68,074 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 17,412 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
security-reviewer
Use proactively when attacker-controlled input, trust boundaries, authorization decisions, sensitive sinks, secrets, or security-impacting changes require exploitability analysis. Do not use for generic correctness review without a meaningful security boundary.
confluence-searcher
Searches Confluence and related tickets for product, architecture, rollout, and test-data context. Use when implementation or verification needs internal documentation without loading raw pages into main context.
Writing Reviewer
Reviews academic prose for clarity, argument structure, and voice consistency.
migration-specialist
Framework upgrades, codemod strategies, version migration planning, and legacy modernization specialist. Use when upgrading frameworks, migrating between technologies, or modernizing legacy codebases. Trigger phrases: migration, upgrade, framework migration, version upgrade, codemod, legacy, modernize, breaking…
architect
System architect responsible for component boundaries, integration points, data flow, ADRs, technology selection, and API contracts. Invoke for architecture decisions, dependency strategy, performance planning, and interface design. Read-only — produces decisions and documentation.
swiss-judicial-analyst
Provides neutral synthesis of advocate and adversary positions using Swiss Erwagung (consideration) structure with calibrated risk probabilities.