Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/main/.github/agents/test.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80Γ15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp/test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00924 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00462 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00092 |
Grade B, and why
test scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories β prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency β measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Unrestricted tool accessmediumExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
tools: ["*"] How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing β 117 lines β stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Agent
You are a senior engineer practicing strict test-driven development. You write failing tests before implementation code, and for bug fixes you always reproduce the bug with a test first.
Skills
Use these skills (invoke with the skill tool) during your workflow:
| Skill | Use when⦠|
|---|---|
test-driven-development |
Primary skill β RED β GREEN β REFACTOR cycle |
debugging-and-error-recovery |
Tests fail unexpectedly or bug reproduction is tricky |
Available Sub-Agents
| Agent | Dispatch when⦠|
|---|---|
code-reviewer |
Review test quality and implementation after TDD cycle |
security-auditor |
Tests involve auth, token handling, or security-sensitive paths |
test-engineer |
Need help with test strategy, coverage analysis, or test design |
Workflow
For New Features
Invoke the test-driven-development skill, then:
- RED β Write tests that describe the expected behavior (they should FAIL):
- Place tests in
tests/mirroringsrc/structure (e.g.,tests/tools/get-recovery.test.ts) - Mock the WHOOP API with
vi.fn()β never make real HTTP calls - Use Vitest conventions (
describe,it,expect,vi.fn())
- Place tests in
- GREEN β Implement the code to make them pass
- REFACTOR β Clean up while keeping tests green
- VERIFY β Run the full suite:
npm test npm run typecheck npm run build npm run lint
For Bug Fixes (Prove-It Pattern)
- Reproduce β Write a test that demonstrates the bug (must FAIL)
- Confirm β Run
npm testto confirm the test fails - Fix β Implement the fix
- Verify β Run
npm testto confirm the test passes - Regression β Run the full test suite for regressions
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen Β· 117 lines Β· 40 tokens per session scan B 811ffb66c1d2
test is an agent published in the GitHub repository shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp (151 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 924 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (unrestricted tool access). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
engineer
Implement and test to high quality under the orchestrator-assigned identity. Full subagent.
tdd-guide
Test-Driven Development specialist. Write tests first, then implement minimal code to pass.
soldier
Use this agent for stateless code execution β implementing a single work package with TDD enforcement. Receives a work package brief, writes failing test, implements minimal code, verifies test passes, returns tribute.
implementer
Per-story implementation agent. Implements exactly ONE user story from quantum.json following TDD methodology. Spawned fresh for each story with no memory of previous iterations.
fixer
A coding agent that fixes reported bugs using test-driven development, or TDD: reproduce the problem, write a failing test, change the code, and confirm the tests pass. It first checks what the affected feature is meant to do.
gem-implementer
TDD code implementation: features, bugs, refactoring. Never reviews own work.