Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/solrac97gr/marketplace-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/solrac97gr/marketplace-plugins/tailwind-best-practices-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/solrac97gr/marketplace-plugins/tailwind-best-practices-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/solrac97gr/marketplace-plugins/tailwind-best-practices-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/solrac97gr/marketplace-plugins/tailwind-best-practices-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/solrac97gr/marketplace-plugins/tailwind-best-practices-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.04793 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.02397 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00959 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00479 |
Grade A, and why
Tailwind Best Practices Reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 730 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A c8b82f1dabdd
Tailwind Best Practices Reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository solrac97gr/marketplace-plugins (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 4,793 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
liquid-glass-auditor
Use this agent when the user mentions Liquid Glass review, iOS 26 UI updates, toolbar improvements, or visual effect migration. Automatically scans SwiftUI codebase for Liquid Glass adoption opportunities - identifies views for glass effects, toolbar improvements, migration from old blur effects, and tinting…
reviewer-accessibility
Multi-perspective accessibility reviewer. Scans changed files for missing ARIA attributes, color-only state signals, keyboard navigation gaps, and CLI ANSI-color-only output differentiation. Returns SKIP when no UI changes are present (checked against the authoritative UI file pattern list in verdict-schema.md §2.3…
review-ui-blazor
UI/Blazor reviewer for Razor components. Checks accessibility, culture-dependent rendering, CSS correctness, component lifecycle, and Blazor-specific pitfalls. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Only runs when .razor files are changed.
ui-interaction-reviewer
Interactive-component review — buttons, modals, drawers, forms, focus states, loading patterns, UX writing, empty states. Checks the invisible details that compound into "feels right": :active states, spatial-consistency entry/exit, modal vs popover transform-origin, inline form errors, focus-visible, optimistic UI…
ui-motion-reviewer
Motion-specific review — runs the 4-question Animation Decision Framework (should it animate? purpose? easing? duration?), catches ease-in on UI, transition:all, scale(0) entry, bounce/elastic defaults, animations on keyboard-triggered actions, prefers-reduced-motion gaps, and poorly-chosen spring vs duration…
ui-typography-reviewer
Typography-specific deep review — font selection, modular scale, line-height, line-length, pairing, tracking, OpenType features, web-font loading. Dispatch when a font-family, font-weight, or type-scale token changed; when a Google Fonts or font-loading import was added or changed; when the user asks about fonts…