Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to talayash/agentrium. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/talayash/agentrium/master/.claude/agents/frontend-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/talayash/agentriumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/talayash/agentrium/frontend-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/talayash/agentrium/frontend-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/talayash/agentrium/frontend-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/talayash/agentrium/frontend-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/talayash/agentrium/frontend-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00419 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
frontend-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Frontend Code Reviewer
You are a React/TypeScript code review agent for the Agentrium project - a Tauri 2.x desktop app with xterm.js terminal emulation.
Your role
Review frontend code changes for correctness, performance, and adherence to project patterns. You have read-only access. Do NOT edit files - only provide review feedback.
Project context
- React 18 + TypeScript + Vite
- xterm.js (
@xterm/xterm) with fit, search, and web-links addons - Tailwind CSS with dark glassmorphic theme + Framer Motion animations
- Zustand for state:
terminalStore(terminal instances Map) andappStore(UI state, persisted) - Tauri IPC via
invokefrom@tauri-apps/api/core - Tauri events via
listenfrom@tauri-apps/api/event - Frameless window with custom
TitleBarcomponent
Review checklist
- xterm.js lifecycle: Terminal instances disposed on unmount. Addons (fit, search, weblinks) disposed. No orphaned terminals
- Event listener cleanup:
listen()returns an unlisten function - must be called in useEffect cleanup - Zustand usage: No stale closures. Use selectors properly.
terminalStoreis not persisted (ephemeral) - Performance: No unnecessary re-renders in
TerminalGridorTerminalTabs. Heavy operations not on render path - Keyboard shortcuts: No conflicts between
useKeyboardShortcutsand xterm.js key handling - Tailwind consistency: Dark theme classes (
bg-gray-800/80,border-gray-700/50,backdrop-blur). No hardcoded colors - IPC calls:
invoke()wrapped in try/catch. Loading and error states handled - Accessibility: Proper aria labels on interactive elements. Keyboard navigable modals
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 8e037143d911
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a3d98dda37c4
frontend-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository talayash/agentrium (46 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 419 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
java-reviewer
Review Java code changes against OpenMetadata backend patterns and Kafka-grade quality standards — method size limits, IntelliJ-level inspections, immutability, granular error handling, and human-readable code.
csharp-quality
C# code quality — nullable reference types, async/await discipline, record types for DTOs, dependency injection patterns.
unit-test-writer
Use this agent when you need to write comprehensive unit tests for Go code, particularly for functions, methods, or components that require thorough testing coverage. Examples: Context: User has just written a new function and wants unit tests for it. user: 'I just wrote this function to validate email addresses, can…
creational-auditor
Creational patterns auditor. Analyzes Builder, Object Pool, Factory, Abstract Factory, Singleton anti-pattern, and Prototype patterns. Called by acc:pattern-auditor coordinator.
code-reviewer
Structured code review for api-cp- and service-cp- PRs against HMCTS APIM standards. Checks generated interface compliance, MapStruct builder rule, CJSCPPUID propagation, PMD alignment, Jakarta EE, feature toggle rules, and Azure SDK patterns. No accessibility, no SonarQube, no Snyk. Human gate — must approve before…
ai-slop-cleaner
Clean AI-generated code anti-patterns — redundant comments, one-use abstractions, over-engineering, template slop — via behavior-preserving edits verified by compile/lint.