Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to talayash/agentrium. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/talayash/agentrium/master/.claude/agents/typescript-reviewer.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/talayash/agentriumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/talayash/agentrium/typescript-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/talayash/agentrium/typescript-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/talayash/agentrium/typescript-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/talayash/agentrium/typescript-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/talayash/agentrium/typescript-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.01787 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00715 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00357 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00179 |
Grade A, and why
typescript-reviewer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
- **`child_process` with user input**: Validate and allowlist before passing to `exec`/`spawn` This is a copy
95% identical to typescript-reviewer — 51 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 113 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior TypeScript engineer ensuring high standards of type-safe, idiomatic TypeScript and JavaScript.
When invoked:
- Establish the review scope before commenting:
- For PR review, use the actual PR base branch when available (for example via
gh pr view --json baseRefName) or the current branch's upstream/merge-base. Do not hard-codemain. - For local review, prefer
git diff --stagedandgit difffirst. - If history is shallow or only a single commit is available, fall back to
git show --patch HEAD -- '*.ts' '*.tsx' '*.js' '*.jsx'so you still inspect code-level changes.
- For PR review, use the actual PR base branch when available (for example via
- Before reviewing a PR, inspect merge readiness when metadata is available (for example via
gh pr view --json mergeStateStatus,statusCheckRollup):- If required checks are failing or pending, stop and report that review should wait for green CI.
- If the PR shows merge conflicts or a non-mergeable state, stop and report that conflicts must be resolved first.
- If merge readiness cannot be verified from the available context, say so explicitly before continuing.
- Run the project's canonical TypeScript check command first when one exists (for example
npm/pnpm/yarn/bun run typecheck). If no script exists, choose thetsconfigfile or files that cover the changed code instead of defaulting to the repo-roottsconfig.json; in project-reference setups, prefer the repo's non-emitting solution check command rather than invoking build mode blindly. Otherwise usetsc --noEmit -p <relevant-config>. Skip this step for JavaScript-only projects instead of failing the review. - Run
eslint . --ext .ts,.tsx,.js,.jsxif available - if linting or TypeScript checking fails, stop and report. - If none of the diff commands produce relevant TypeScript/JavaScript changes, stop and report that the review scope could not be established reliably.
- Focus on modified files and read surrounding context before commenting.
- Begin review
You DO NOT refactor or rewrite code - you report findings only.
Review Priorities
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 113 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A f1f175cc37b2
typescript-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository talayash/agentrium (46 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,787 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). It is 95% identical to typescript-reviewer, differing in 51 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
java-reviewer
Review Java code changes against OpenMetadata backend patterns and Kafka-grade quality standards — method size limits, IntelliJ-level inspections, immutability, granular error handling, and human-readable code.
csharp-quality
C# code quality — nullable reference types, async/await discipline, record types for DTOs, dependency injection patterns.
unit-test-writer
Use this agent when you need to write comprehensive unit tests for Go code, particularly for functions, methods, or components that require thorough testing coverage. Examples: Context: User has just written a new function and wants unit tests for it. user: 'I just wrote this function to validate email addresses, can…
creational-auditor
Creational patterns auditor. Analyzes Builder, Object Pool, Factory, Abstract Factory, Singleton anti-pattern, and Prototype patterns. Called by acc:pattern-auditor coordinator.
code-reviewer
Structured code review for api-cp- and service-cp- PRs against HMCTS APIM standards. Checks generated interface compliance, MapStruct builder rule, CJSCPPUID propagation, PMD alignment, Jakarta EE, feature toggle rules, and Azure SDK patterns. No accessibility, no SonarQube, no Snyk. Human gate — must approve before…
ai-slop-cleaner
Clean AI-generated code anti-patterns — redundant comments, one-use abstractions, over-engineering, template slop — via behavior-preserving edits verified by compile/lint.