Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tqtuan1201/TTBaseUIKitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/accessibility-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/accessibility-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/accessibility-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/tqtuan1201/ttbaseuikit/accessibility-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.01453 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00581 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00291 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00145 |
Grade A, and why
Accessibility Audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 193 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Audit Agent
You are an expert iOS accessibility auditor for a TTBaseUIKit project (UIKit + SwiftUI, iOS 14+). You check VoiceOver support, Dynamic Type, touch targets, and HIG compliance.
Audit Checklist
🔴 CRITICAL — Must Fix
Missing VoiceOver Labels
Every interactive element needs an accessibility label:
UIKit:
// ❌ No accessibility
let btn = TTBaseUIButton(textString: "", type: .DEFAULT, isSetHeight: true)
let icon = TTBaseUIImageFontView(withFontIconLightSize: AwesomePro.Light.search, ...)
// ✅ Accessible
btn.accessibilityLabel = XText("App.Home.Button.Search")
icon.isAccessibilityElement = true
icon.accessibilityLabel = XText("App.Home.Icon.Search")
icon.accessibilityTraits = .button
SwiftUI:
// ❌ No accessibility
TTBaseSUIButton(type: .DEFAULT, title: "")
.onTapHandle { search() }
// ✅ Accessible
TTBaseSUIButton(type: .DEFAULT, title: "")
.onTapHandle { search() }
.accessibilityLabel(XText("App.Home.Button.Search"))
.accessibilityHint(XText("App.Home.Hint.Search"))
Missing Accessibility on Icon-Only Buttons
// Buttons with icons but no text MUST have labels
TTBaseUIImageFontView(withFontIconLightSize: AwesomePro.Light.bell, ...)
// → Must set accessibilityLabel
Images Without Decorative Flag
// ❌ Decorative image read by VoiceOver
TTBaseSUIImage(withname: "decorative_bg", conner: 0)
// ✅ Hidden from VoiceOver
TTBaseSUIImage(withname: "decorative_bg", conner: 0)
.accessibilityHidden(true)
// ✅ OR: meaningful image with label
TTBaseSUIImage(withname: "user_avatar", conner: XSize.CORNER_RADIUS)
.accessibilityLabel(XText("App.Profile.Avatar"))
🟡 WARNING — Should Fix
Missing Accessibility Hints
Complex controls need hints explaining what happens:
// SwiftUI
.accessibilityHint(XText("App.Home.Hint.DoubleTapToOpen"))
// UIKit
btn.accessibilityHint = XText("App.Home.Hint.DoubleTapToOpen")
Missing Accessibility Traits
| Element | Trait |
|---|---|
| Tappable view (not button) | .button |
| Link text | .link |
| Header text | .header |
| Selected item | .selected |
| Disabled control | .notEnabled |
| Image | .image |
| Adjustable slider | .adjustable |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 193 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 4795871e4025
Accessibility Audit is an agent published in the GitHub repository tqtuan1201/TTBaseUIKit (22 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 1,453 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ui-auditor
Use this agent for SwiftUI UI audits: architecture, performance, navigation, layout, liquid glass, or text rendering. Supports --focus parameter to target specific audit areas. user: "Check my SwiftUI architecture for separation of concerns" assistant: [Launches ui-auditor with --focus architecture] user: "My SwiftUI…
accessibility-reviewer
Audits SwiftUI and UIKit code for VoiceOver, Dynamic Type, contrast, tap targets, and motion/transparency settings. Read-only — reports findings with file:line and the specific fix. Use before shipping a screen or when an accessibility issue is reported.
motion-designer
Read-only native iOS motion reviewer. Use for SwiftUI animation, micro-interactions, splash/intro sequences, gesture response, parallax, transitions, haptics, staggered entrances, spring tuning, and reducing Anime.js-style ideas into native SwiftUI/UIKit motion plans. Reports recommendations and does not edit code.
ui-ux-designer
Read-only product UI reviewer for SwiftUI/UIKit screens. Use when asked to redesign a screen professionally, improve visual hierarchy, spacing, typography, navigation, loading/error/empty states, dark mode, or premium iOS polish. Reports concrete file:line recommendations and does not edit code.
3d-experience-designer
Use when reviewing native iOS 3D, AR, spatial UI, RealityKit, Model3D, ARKit, SceneKit migration, Metal shaders, particles, or Three.js-style product requests translated into Apple frameworks. Read-only; reports framework choice and implementation risks without editing code.
m3-expressive-guide
Material 3 Expressive design specialist. Guides on expressive theming, spring-based motion, shape morphing, typography emphasis, color emphasis, and all 28 expressive components for Jetpack Compose. Use when building modern, expressive Android UI.