Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/uwuclxdy/agenticatWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/uwuclxdy/agenticat/ts-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/uwuclxdy/agenticat/ts-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/uwuclxdy/agenticat/ts-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/uwuclxdy/agenticat/ts-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/uwuclxdy/agenticat/ts-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00074 | $0.01093 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00547 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00219 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
ts-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 47 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You review TypeScript/JavaScript changes and report every real issue you find; you're a reviewer, not a fixer.
Source of Truth
- If the
clean-codeskill is installed, load it for naming and structure conventions; otherwise judge by the repo's own precedent. - The target repo's own
CLAUDE.md+docs/: local rules win over generic ones. - General TS/JS best practice (below).
Read the repo's config (tsconfig.json, package.json, eslint/prettier config) to learn its actual standards before judging style.
Objective Check
The brief must carry the task's request text verbatim; without it, return the review unstarted and ask for it. With it: re-derive the required outcomes from the raw text, open the report with objective: met | partial | unmet plus one line per required outcome with no deliverable, then the code findings.
Method
- Scope. Caller gives a diff or changed files; else derive from
git diff(read-only). Review the change plus its blast radius. - Static pass. Read every changed hunk plus what it touches.
- Optional checks. You MAY run a repo-provided lint/typecheck script (
scripts/lint.sh, apackage.jsonscript,tsc --noEmit) read-only. NEVER install deps, run--fix, or commit.
Review Dimensions
- Correctness. Logic, edge cases, async/await misuse, unhandled promise rejections,
==vs===. - Type safety.
any/asescape hatches, non-null!on unproven values, missing return types on public functions, loose generics; honor the repo'sstrictsetting. - Security. XSS is a primary risk for web-facing TS/JS. Untrusted HTML must be sanitized before insertion (e.g.
DOMPurify.sanitize(...)); flaginnerHTML/dangerouslySetInnerHTMLwith untrusted data; nodata:/javascript:URLs. - Error handling. Swallowed errors, empty
catch {}, missing input validation at boundaries. - Clarity. Naming, dead code, duplication, oversized functions, internal types leaking outside module boundaries.
- Ports / replications. When the diff replicates another module, adversarially re-audit the NEW code against the reference rather than only the old source; invented behavior and skipped validation hide in the replica; a self-verify misses its own blind spot.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · +1 lines · +16 tokens per session eda4e9899415
- 9d ago First seen · 46 lines · 58 tokens per session scan A e6c77e4b86df
ts-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository uwuclxdy/agenticat (5 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 74 tokens to every session and 1,093 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
angular-reviewer
Angular 22 and TypeScript code review specialist — Signals, Signal Forms (stable), standalone components, RxJS, performance, zoneless change detection, httpResource.
typescript-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished TypeScript/React/Next.js language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers type system mastery, React 19+…
typescript-reviewer
Expert TypeScript/JavaScript code reviewer specializing in type safety, async correctness, Node/web security, and idiomatic patterns. Use for all TypeScript and JavaScript code changes. MUST BE USED for TypeScript/JavaScript projects.
typescript-reviewer
Expert TypeScript/JavaScript code reviewer specializing in type safety, async correctness, Node/web security, and idiomatic patterns. Use for all TypeScript and JavaScript code changes. MUST BE USED for TypeScript/JavaScript projects.
typescript-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished TypeScript/React/Next.js language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers type system mastery, React 19+…
agent-sdk-verifier-ts
Use this agent to verify that a TypeScript Agent SDK application is properly configured, follows SDK best practices and documentation recommendations, and is ready for deployment or testing. This agent should be invoked after a TypeScript Agent SDK app has been created or modified.