Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/yanmxa/cc-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/yanmxa/cc-plugins/go-structure-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yanmxa/cc-plugins/go-structure-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yanmxa/cc-plugins/go-structure-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/yanmxa/cc-plugins/go-structure-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/yanmxa/cc-plugins/go-structure-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01588 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00635 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00318 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00159 |
Grade A, and why
go-structure-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 147 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 38683e00e3fc
go-structure-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository yanmxa/cc-plugins (10 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,588 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other agents, from other repositories
go-expert
Use this agent as a distinguished Go language authority and domain expert for peer-review-level code review. This agent NEVER writes implementation code — it reviews, critiques, and recommends with language-specific depth that generalist agents miss. Covers concurrency patterns, channel orchestration, interface…
go-reviewer
Expert Go code reviewer specializing in idiomatic Go, concurrency patterns, error handling, and performance. Use for all Go code changes. MUST BE USED for Go projects.
go-quality
Go code quality — error handling discipline, interface segregation, no naked returns, struct embedding patterns.
Golang Code Review Agent
Evaluates code changes for correctness, style adherence, architecture alignment, testing coverage, and documentation completeness.
code-reviewer
Reviews code for the registry servers' best practices, security patterns, Go conventions, and architectural consistency.
code-reviewer
Review a Go diff in agnostic-ai for bugs, style, and cross-adapter issues. Use before merging a PR.