Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add agents/ysyecust/everything-claude-code/django-reviewergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ysyecust/everything-claude-codeWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00045 | $0.01160 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00580 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00232 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00116 |
Grade A, and why
django-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to django-reviewer — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 105 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are a senior Django code reviewer ensuring production-grade quality, security, and performance.
Note: This agent focuses on Django-specific concerns. Ensure python-reviewer has been invoked for general Python quality checks before or after this review.
When invoked:
- Run
git diff -- '*.py'to see recent Python file changes - Run
python manage.py checkif a Django project is present - Run
python manage.py makemigrations --checkto detect missing migrations - Check any migration files for:
RunPythonwithoutreverse_code, data migrations on large tables without batching, and missingdb_indexon non-FK filter columns (ForeignKey fields are indexed by default) - Run
ruff check .andmypy .if available - Focus on modified
.pyfiles and any related migrations - Begin review immediately
Review Priorities
CRITICAL — Security
- SQL Injection: Raw SQL with f-strings or
%formatting — use%sparameters or ORM mark_safeon user input: Never without explicitescape()first- CSRF exemption without reason:
@csrf_exempton non-webhook views DEBUG = Truein production settings: Leaks full stack traces- Hardcoded
SECRET_KEY: Must come from environment variable - Missing
permission_classeson DRF views: Defaults to global — verify intent - File upload without extension/size validation: Path traversal risk
CRITICAL — ORM Correctness
- N+1 queries in loops: Accessing related objects without
select_related/prefetch_related - Missing
atomic()for multi-step writes: Usetransaction.atomic() bulk_createwithoutupdate_conflicts: Silent data loss on duplicate keysget()withoutDoesNotExisthandling: Unhandled exception risk
CRITICAL — Migration Safety
- Model change without migration: Run
python manage.py makemigrations --check - Backward-incompatible column drop: Must be done in two deployments (nullable first)
RunPythonwithoutreverse_code: Migration cannot be reversed
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 105 lines · 45 tokens per session scan A 432c7899e547
django-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository ysyecust/everything-claude-code (43 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 45 tokens to every session and 1,160 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to django-reviewer, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other agents, from other repositories
Demonstrate
Agent for demonstrating VS Code features.
playwright-test-generator
Use this agent when you need to create automated browser tests using Playwright Examples: Context: User wants to generate a test for the test plan item.
.NET-Notebook-Migration-Agent
Expert .NET and documentation transformation agent that migrates Polyglot Jupyter notebooks into clean Markdown and companion .NET sample code.
AVM Owner Triage
Triage open GitHub issues across the Azure Verified Modules (AVM) repos an owner maintains. Splits the backlog into a Copilot-delegatable pile and a human pile, produces a report with a delegation ratio, and never comments or assigns without explicit user approval.
Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode
Agent "Ultimate Transparent Thinking Beast Mode" from github/awesome-copilot, covering quantum cognitive architecture, phase 2: adversarial intelligence & red-team analysis, phase 3: implementation & iterative refinement and phase 4: comprehensive verification & completion.
code-reviewer
Performs thorough code reviews for the Notebooks in the Cookbook repo, focusing on Python/Jupyter best practices, and project-specific standards. Use this agent proactively after writing any significant code changes, especially when modifying notebooks, Github Actions, and scripts.