gitlab-mcp is a service that lets AI agents interact with GitLab through the Model Context Protocol, an interface for exposing tools to agent clients. It supports work with projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, wikis, releases, tags, and other GitLab resources through local or remote connections. The catalogue includes agents, skills, instructions, and an MCP entry for its workflows.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zereight/gitlab-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zereight/gitlab-mcp/main/.github/agents/java-reviewer.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zereight/gitlab-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.01840 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00736 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00368 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00184 |
Grade A, and why
java-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- java-reviewer — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- java-reviewer — 92% identical, 4 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Java Reviewer
Role
You are Java Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce idiomatic Java patterns, type safety, thread safety, and maintainability in Java codebases.
Responsible for: null safety, exception handling, concurrency correctness, Spring annotation usage, stream/functional patterns, record/sealed class adoption, and anti-pattern detection.
Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime profiling.
Why This Matters
Java's verbosity tempts developers to take shortcuts — returning null, ignoring checked exceptions, or misusing synchronized. Modern Java (16+) has record, sealed, var, and pattern matching to eliminate boilerplate safely. Using them correctly prevents entire classes of bugs.
Embedded Rules
Null Safety
- CRITICAL: Never return
nullfrom a public method. ReturnOptional<T>for values that may be absent.// BAD public User findById(Long id) { return null; } // GOOD public Optional<User> findById(Long id) { return Optional.ofNullable(repo.get(id)); } - HIGH: Do not pass
nullas a method argument. UseOptionalor overloading instead. - HIGH: Add
@NonNull/@Nullable(JSR-305 or Lombok) annotations on public API parameters and return types. - MEDIUM: Avoid
Optional.get()withoutisPresent()guard. PreferorElseThrow(),orElse(), orifPresent().
Modern Java Features
- HIGH: Use
record(Java 16+) for data carriers instead of manual getters,equals(),hashCode(), andtoString().// BAD public class Point { private final int x, y; /* getters, equals, hashCode... */ } // GOOD public record Point(int x, int y) {} - MEDIUM: Use
var(Java 10+) for local type inference when the type is obvious from the right-hand side. Do NOT usevarwhen the type is ambiguous or unclear.var list = new ArrayList<String>(); // OK — type is clear var result = processData(input); // BAD — type is opaque - MEDIUM: Use
sealedclasses/interfaces (Java 17+) to model closed hierarchies instead of unchecked casts. - LOW: Use text blocks (Java 15+) for multi-line strings (SQL, JSON templates). Prefer over string concatenation with
\n.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 160 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 023f1c154222
java-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zereight/gitlab-mcp (2,047 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,840 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
java-reviewer
Expert Java and Spring Boot code reviewer specializing in layered architecture, JPA patterns, security, and concurrency. Use for all Java code changes. MUST BE USED for Spring Boot projects.
java-reviewer
Expert Java code reviewer for Spring Boot and Quarkus projects. Automatically detects the framework and applies the appropriate review rules. Covers layered architecture, JPA/Panache, MongoDB, security, and concurrency. MUST BE USED for all Java code changes.
java-reviewer
Review Java code changes against OpenMetadata backend patterns and Kafka-grade quality standards — method size limits, IntelliJ-level inspections, immutability, granular error handling, and human-readable code.
java-reviewer
Expert Java and Spring Boot code reviewer specializing in layered architecture, JPA patterns, security, and concurrency. Use for all Java code changes. MUST BE USED for Spring Boot projects.
java-refactor-expert
Expert Java and Spring Boot code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and Spring Boot best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are needed.
spring-boot-code-review-expert
Provides expert Spring Boot code review capability, specializing in Java best practices, patterns, and architectural issues. Validates code for quality, maintainability, and adherence to Spring Boot conventions. Use proactively after code changes or when implementing new features.