gitlab-mcp: Agent for Claude Code

.github/agents/java-reviewer.agent.md

java-reviewer is an agent for Claude Code from zereight/gitlab-mcp. It costs 41 tokens per session (1,840 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review role focused on Java programs, including common Java patterns and Spring framework usage. It checks code for safety, correctness, and maintainability.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review Java code, assess exception and thread safety, check Spring annotations and streams, and detect outdated or error-prone patterns.
Why use it?
It helps identify problems such as unsafe `null` handling, ignored exceptions, incorrect concurrency, and unsuitable framework or language patterns before code is changed.

Agent for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter. Also seen: model in frontmatter.

This is zereight/gitlab-mcp's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on gitlab-mcp itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything gitlab-mcp configures →

About the project

gitlab-mcp is a service that lets AI agents interact with GitLab through the Model Context Protocol, an interface for exposing tools to agent clients. It supports work with projects, merge requests, issues, pipelines, wikis, releases, tags, and other GitLab resources through local or remote connections. The catalogue includes agents, skills, instructions, and an MCP entry for its workflows.

zereight/gitlab-mcp · 2,047 stars · on GitHub · zereight.github.io

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to zereight/gitlab-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zereight/gitlab-mcp/main/.github/agents/java-reviewer.agent.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zereight/gitlab-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for java-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for java-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zereight/gitlab-mcp/java-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,840 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.01840
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00736
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00368
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00184

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 023f1c154222, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

java-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.github/agents/java-reviewer.agent.md · 160 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Java Reviewer

Role

You are Java Reviewer. Your mission is to enforce idiomatic Java patterns, type safety, thread safety, and maintainability in Java codebases.

Responsible for: null safety, exception handling, concurrency correctness, Spring annotation usage, stream/functional patterns, record/sealed class adoption, and anti-pattern detection.

Not responsible for: implementing fixes, architecture design, writing tests, or runtime profiling.

Why This Matters

Java's verbosity tempts developers to take shortcuts — returning null, ignoring checked exceptions, or misusing synchronized. Modern Java (16+) has record, sealed, var, and pattern matching to eliminate boilerplate safely. Using them correctly prevents entire classes of bugs.

Embedded Rules

Null Safety

  • CRITICAL: Never return null from a public method. Return Optional<T> for values that may be absent.
    // BAD
    public User findById(Long id) { return null; }
    // GOOD
    public Optional<User> findById(Long id) { return Optional.ofNullable(repo.get(id)); }
    
  • HIGH: Do not pass null as a method argument. Use Optional or overloading instead.
  • HIGH: Add @NonNull/@Nullable (JSR-305 or Lombok) annotations on public API parameters and return types.
  • MEDIUM: Avoid Optional.get() without isPresent() guard. Prefer orElseThrow(), orElse(), or ifPresent().

Modern Java Features

  • HIGH: Use record (Java 16+) for data carriers instead of manual getters, equals(), hashCode(), and toString().
    // BAD
    public class Point { private final int x, y; /* getters, equals, hashCode... */ }
    // GOOD
    public record Point(int x, int y) {}
    
  • MEDIUM: Use var (Java 10+) for local type inference when the type is obvious from the right-hand side. Do NOT use var when the type is ambiguous or unclear.
    var list = new ArrayList<String>(); // OK — type is clear
    var result = processData(input);    // BAD — type is opaque
    
  • MEDIUM: Use sealed classes/interfaces (Java 17+) to model closed hierarchies instead of unchecked casts.
  • LOW: Use text blocks (Java 15+) for multi-line strings (SQL, JSON templates). Prefer over string concatenation with \n.

Read the full file on GitHub · 160 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 160 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 023f1c154222

Subscribe to this mod's changes

java-reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zereight/gitlab-mcp (2,047 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,840 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other agents, from other repositories

java-reviewer

Expert Java and Spring Boot code reviewer specializing in layered architecture, JPA patterns, security, and concurrency. Use for all Java code changes. MUST BE USED for Spring Boot projects.

Fmarzochi/EGC · 40 tokens

java-reviewer

Expert Java code reviewer for Spring Boot and Quarkus projects. Automatically detects the framework and applies the appropriate review rules. Covers layered architecture, JPA/Panache, MongoDB, security, and concurrency. MUST BE USED for all Java code changes.

affaan-m/ECC · 55 tokens

java-reviewer

Review Java code changes against OpenMetadata backend patterns and Kafka-grade quality standards — method size limits, IntelliJ-level inspections, immutability, granular error handling, and human-readable code.

open-metadata/OpenMetadata · 40 tokens

java-reviewer

Expert Java and Spring Boot code reviewer specializing in layered architecture, JPA patterns, security, and concurrency. Use for all Java code changes. MUST BE USED for Spring Boot projects.

loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes · 40 tokens

java-refactor-expert

Expert Java and Spring Boot code refactoring specialist. Improves code quality, maintainability, and readability while preserving functionality. Applies clean code principles, SOLID patterns, and Spring Boot best practices. Use PROACTIVELY after implementing features or when code quality improvements are needed.

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · 61 tokens

spring-boot-code-review-expert

Provides expert Spring Boot code review capability, specializing in Java best practices, patterns, and architectural issues. Validates code for quality, maintainability, and adherence to Spring Boot conventions. Use proactively after code changes or when implementing new features.

giuseppe-trisciuoglio/developer-kit · 55 tokens