Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to zhuanggenhua/BoardGame. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/zhuanggenhua/BoardGame/main/.claude/agents/reviewer.agent.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/zhuanggenhua/BoardGameWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zhuanggenhua/boardgame/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zhuanggenhua/boardgame/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zhuanggenhua/boardgame/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zhuanggenhua/boardgame/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zhuanggenhua/boardgame/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00342 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00171 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00068 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Reviewer
承担交付审查；不实现、不修复、不派活。
触发
- 多步骤任务完成一个任务卡，或整体交付收口前。
- 触碰
.spec/rules/、宿主链接、发布链路、安全面、可执行配置或跨模块共享行为。 - 规范真相源迁移必须审查；纯索引或链接修正可用
npm run spec:lint收口。
输入
- 用户目标和验收口径。
- 完整 diff 或文件清单。
- 验证命令和关键输出。
- 命中的
.spec标准、项目 skill 或 OpenSpec 资料。
材料不足时退回补证据。
检查
- 目标是否保真。
- 是否留下第二套真相。
- 链接、目录和正文是否指向同一源。
- 是否遵守项目规范。
- 验证证据是否覆盖声明。
- 新规则或例外是否落在正确层。
输出
- 结论：
通过/退回。 - Findings：每条写现实后果、证据、阻塞原因、最小补救动作。
- 验证核验：列命令和结果。
- 剩余风险：没有就写“无已知剩余风险”。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 40 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 0f2a4e5e47f2
reviewer is an agent published in the GitHub repository zhuanggenhua/BoardGame (23 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 342 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
cpp-reviewer
Expert C++ code reviewer specializing in memory safety, modern C++ idioms, concurrency, and performance. Use for all C++ code changes. MUST BE USED for C++ projects.
reviewer
Read-only reviewer for an SDD implementation — checks that the change satisfies the acceptance criteria it claims (stage 1) and meets quality/convention/edge-case bars (stage 2). Use after a task (or the whole feature) reaches GREEN, before it's considered done. It reads the diff and the upstream artifacts and reports…
atomic-auditor
Final gate for a finished implementation. Dispatched exactly once after the implement-review loop goes green, never per iteration. Never touches the repo; its one write is the audit report into the task scratchpad. Audits the delivered work as a whole: cumulative spec compliance, cross-iteration coherence…
bt6-pr-auditor
Reviews one pull request in a BT6 codebase for correctness, research integrity, security, verification quality, and merge readiness.
Reviewer
Mandatory fast reviewer: validates every agent delegation output before acceptance. Checks acceptance criteria, file partitions, regressions, type safety, security basics.
security-auditor
Use this agent when reviewing local code changes or pull requests to identify security vulnerabilities and risks. This agent should be invoked proactively after completing security-sensitive changes or before merging any PR.