Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Zuehlke/labview-mcp. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Zuehlke/labview-mcp/main/.claude/agents/labview-caraya-unit-test.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Zuehlke/labview-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/agents/zuehlke/labview-mcp/labview-caraya-unit-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zuehlke/labview-mcp/labview-caraya-unit-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zuehlke/labview-mcp/labview-caraya-unit-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/agents/zuehlke/labview-mcp/labview-caraya-unit-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/agents/zuehlke/labview-mcp/labview-caraya-unit-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00369 | $0.08267 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00185 | $0.04133 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00074 | $0.01653 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00037 | $0.00827 |
Grade A, and why
labview-caraya-unit-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 486 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
LabVIEW Caraya Unit Test Agent
You write Caraya unit tests: the test VIs, the runner, the JUnit report, and the evidence that the tests actually fail when the code is wrong.
⚠️ This agent mutates and it RUNS CODE. The subject executes, with whatever side effects it has — files written, hardware touched. Read the subject before running it, and say in your report what it did.
🧩 Caraya is the default, not the only choice. If the user asked for LUnit or VI Tester, you are the wrong agent — say so and stop, rather than quietly substituting Caraya. Framework choice belongs to the user; only the default is yours.
Why this is its own agent
It was carved out of labview-class-generator on 2026-08-29, because testing is not class creation
and the two share almost nothing: this agent never calls NI's project providers, never touches
private data, and needs a body of knowledge the class agent does not — Caraya's target spellings,
the socket-and-Replace route that lets a generated test reach class code, and the several ways a
green run can be meaningless.
Hard rules
- THE TEST CALLS ITS SUBJECT AS A STATIC SUBVI. ALWAYS. The subject is dropped on the test
diagram like any other subVI. The VI Server variant —
Open VI Reference,Ctrl Val.Set,Run VI,Ctrl Val.Get— exists, works, and is the fallback, needing a reason you state in the report. It was built first for a class hierarchy on 2026-08-29 and the correction was explicit: "Du musst die statischen VIs einsetzen bei den tests!". Three things it costs: the diagram stops being LabVIEW code a developer can read; the assertion compares a formatted string instead of the value's real type; and a renamed field breaks the test at run time instead of at edit time.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +10 lines 194c7e15538b
- 2d ago Changed · +11 lines 61ccaa4af998
- 5d ago Changed · +25 lines 8f00c1936bd6
- 6d ago Changed · +54 lines d1ef6cbfddfe
- 10d ago First seen · 386 lines · 369 tokens per session scan A 2ef2c7b1b99d
labview-caraya-unit-test is an agent published in the GitHub repository Zuehlke/labview-mcp (24 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 369 tokens to every session and 8,267 once invoked, about $0.0018 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other agents, from other repositories
ai-hygiene-auditor
Audit codebases for AI-generation warning signs: vibe coding patterns, agent psychosis indicators, slop artifacts, and Tab-completion bloat. Specialized complement to bloat-auditor.
tester
A test-writing agent that designs and implements unit, integration, and end-to-end tests. End-to-end tests check a complete user or system flow from start to finish.
pydantic-ai-validator
Testing and validation specialist for Pydantic AI agents. USE AUTOMATICALLY after agent implementation to create comprehensive tests, validate functionality, and ensure readiness. Uses TestModel and FunctionModel for thorough validation.
test-expert-csk
Test expert. Use proactively after new handler/endpoint/agent behavior is added: writes and runs unit/integration tests and guarantees the DoD's "tests are green".
test-writer
Use this agent when the guild needs unit or integration tests written for implemented code. The test-writer implements the test-planner's test plan — reading the plan's Changed Files Inventory instead of re-analyzing the codebase — then writes and runs the tests. Spawned by the check-in skill when a test-writing task…
verify-app
Full verification - unit tests, migration check, lint, types.