Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Armert-Labs/cursor-plugin/plugin install cursorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/armert-labs/cursor-plugin/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/armert-labs/cursor-plugin/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/armert-labs/cursor-plugin/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/armert-labs/cursor-plugin/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/armert-labs/cursor-plugin/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00744 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00298 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run a Cursor code review of the local git state. Cursor reviews read-only (--mode ask); it does not edit anything.
Raw slash-command arguments:
$ARGUMENTS
Core constraint:
- This command is review-only.
- Do not fix issues, apply patches, or suggest that you are about to make changes.
- Your only job is to run the review and return Cursor's output verbatim to the user.
Execution mode rules:
- If the raw arguments include
--wait, do not ask. Run the review in the foreground. - If the raw arguments include
--background, do not ask. Run the review in a Claude background task. - Otherwise, estimate the review size before asking:
- For working-tree review, start with
git status --short --untracked-files=all. - For working-tree review, also inspect both
git diff --shortstat --cachedandgit diff --shortstat. - For base-branch review, use
git diff --shortstat <base>...HEAD. - Treat untracked files or directories as reviewable work even when
git diff --shortstatis empty. - Only conclude there is nothing to review when the relevant working-tree status is empty or the explicit branch diff is empty.
- Recommend waiting only when the review is clearly tiny, roughly 1-2 files total and no sign of a broader directory-sized change.
- In every other case, including unclear size, recommend background.
- When in doubt, run the review instead of declaring that there is nothing to review.
- For working-tree review, start with
- Then use
AskUserQuestionexactly once with two options, putting the recommended option first and suffixing its label with(Recommended):Wait for resultsRun in background
Argument handling:
- Preserve the user's arguments exactly.
- Do not strip
--waitor--backgroundyourself. - Do not add extra review instructions or rewrite the user's intent.
- The companion script parses
--waitand--background, but Claude Code'sBash(..., run_in_background: true)is what actually detaches the run. - A specific model can be chosen with
--model(e.g.--model reviewfor a strong reviewer,--model opusfor a Claude cross-check).
Foreground flow:
- Run:
node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/cursor-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"
- Return the command stdout verbatim, exactly as-is.
- Do not paraphrase, summarize, or add commentary before or after it.
- Do not fix any issues mentioned in the review output.
Background flow:
- Launch the review with
Bashin the background:
Bash({
command: `node "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/cursor-companion.mjs" review "$ARGUMENTS"`,
description: "Cursor review",
run_in_background: true
})
- Do not call
BashOutputor wait for completion in this turn. - After launching the command, tell the user: "Cursor review started in the background. Check
/cursor:statusfor progress."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A 2a36812602cf
review is a command published in the GitHub repository Armert-Labs/cursor-plugin (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 744 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
note
Add a note to the active task - progress, decisions, context. --session (aliases --snapshot, --pre-compact, --compact) writes a resume-grade session snapshot without ending the session. --team writes a fact or a decision into the standing team's file.
review-skills
Review changed skills: automated bash checks + 9 structural dimensions (D1-D9) + 5 intent checks (M1-M5). PASS/FAIL verdict. Fix in-place.
resolve-dependabot-prs
Triage open Dependabot PRs, return a quick risk/action summary table, then enter planning mode with an ordered rebase→merge→follow-up→resume resolution plan.
check
A combined code-quality review and design-to-implementation consistency check. It reads the changed files once, then evaluates them from both review perspectives.
audit-security
Check baseline CI security hygiene against the Starter Series bar — gitleaks, CodeQL, dep audit, license check, --ignore-scripts, Dependabot grouped, secret-scanning, claude-code-security-review, claude-security-guidance. Read-only, complementary to Anthropic's in-session security guidance plugin.