Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/athrael-soju/framework-generator/framegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/athrael-soju/framework-generatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/athrael-soju/framework-generator/frame)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/athrael-soju/framework-generator/frame"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/athrael-soju/framework-generator/frame.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00798 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00399 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00160 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00080 |
Grade A, and why
frame scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 143 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Frame
Define the purpose and boundaries of a new framework.
Inputs
| Input | Source |
|---|---|
| problem_description | User input |
| context | User input |
| scope | User input |
| reference_frameworks | Optional: existing frameworks |
Input Format
User-provided problem description:
problem_description: |
What workflow or process needs systematizing?
What's painful or inconsistent about it?
What would success look like?
User-provided context:
context:
domain: [Area of work]
constraints: [Limitations, requirements]
intended_users: [Who will run this framework]
Optional reference frameworks:
reference_frameworks:
- name: [Framework Name]
path: docs/models/[framework].md
Process
1. Clarify Problem - Ask what workflow or process the user wants to systematize:
- What are the steps they currently do manually?
- What's painful or inconsistent about it?
- What would success look like?
2. Articulate Purpose - Draft why this framework should exist:
- What value does systematizing provide?
- Why a framework vs. a checklist or ad-hoc process?
3. Set Boundaries - Define scope:
- What's explicitly in scope?
- What's explicitly out of scope?
- What adjacent problems are we not solving?
4. Identify Triggers - When should this framework be run:
- One-time vs. ongoing?
- What events or conditions trigger execution?
5. Determine Type - What kind of framework:
- Foundation: single assessment, run once, feeds other frameworks
- Pipeline: sequential stages, ongoing, feedback loops
- Cyclical: repeating execution on a cadence
- Hub: central stage that others connect to
6. Map Dependencies - What other frameworks does this require:
- Does it need outputs from another framework?
- What external inputs are required?
Interaction
Use the AskUserQuestion tool for:
- Clarifying the problem and workflow to systematize
- Choosing between framework types
- Confirming scope boundaries
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 143 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 581bf4d88f71
frame is a command published in the GitHub repository athrael-soju/framework-generator (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 798 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
run-powershell
Execute a PowerShell script on an Atera agent.
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
log-time
Log work hours on an Atera ticket.
restore-check
Restore-readiness check - has this actually been restore-tested, for one client or the whole portfolio.
eol-report
EOL/EOS risk report — devices, OS versions, and firmware approaching or past end-of-life/end-of-support, prioritized by criticality.
update-ticket
Update fields on an existing Atera ticket.