plan_local

A planning command that studies a codebase before proposing implementation work. It turns a feature request, document, issue, or conversation into a detailed plan without writing code.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to analyze a requested feature, bug fix, refactor, or new capability. It can inspect the repository, identify reusable code, research when needed, and produce an implementation plan.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of planning changes without understanding existing files, patterns, or earlier plans. It also separates investigation and design from implementation.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/cognitx-leyton/codegraph/plan_local
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/cognitx-leyton/codegraph

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 7 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,819 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00007 $0.04819
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.02410
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00964
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00482

Measured 2d ago against content hash 9035f7befbb5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan_local scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/plan_local.md · 546 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 546 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Implementation Plan Generator

Input: $ARGUMENTS

Objective

Transform the input into a battle-tested implementation plan through codebase exploration, research, and pattern extraction.

Core Principle: PLAN ONLY - no code written. Create a context-rich document that enables one-pass implementation.

Order: CODEBASE FIRST → REUSE INVENTORY → RESEARCH IF NEEDED → DESIGN → GENERATE.


Phase 1: PARSE

Determine Input Type

Input Action
.prd.md file Read PRD, extract next pending phase
Other .md file Read and extract feature description
Free-form text Use directly as feature input
Blank Use conversation context

Extract Feature Understanding

  • Problem: What are we solving?
  • User Story: As a [user], I want to [action], so that [benefit]
  • Type: NEW_CAPABILITY / ENHANCEMENT / REFACTOR / BUG_FIX
  • Complexity: LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH

Prior Plan Check

If other plans exist in .agents/plans/:

  1. Read their summaries to understand what infrastructure they create
  2. Note any shared files (e.g., ViewTypeSwitcher.tsx modified by multiple plans)
  3. Reference prior plans explicitly: "Depends on: {plan}.plan.md creating {component}"
  4. If a shared file will be modified by multiple plans, note the merge order

Phase 2: EXPLORE

Study the Codebase

Use the Explore agent to find:

  1. Similar implementations - analogous features with file:line references
  2. Naming conventions - actual examples from the codebase
  3. Error handling patterns - how errors are created and handled
  4. Type definitions - relevant interfaces and types
  5. Test patterns - test file structure and assertion styles

Document Patterns

Category File:Lines Pattern
NAMING path/to/file.ts:10-15 {pattern description}
ERRORS path/to/file.ts:20-30 {pattern description}
TYPES path/to/file.ts:1-10 {pattern description}
TESTS path/to/test.ts:1-25 {pattern description}

Read the full file on GitHub · 546 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 546 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 9035f7befbb5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan_local is a command published in the GitHub repository cognitx-leyton/codegraph (11 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 4,819 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.