Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/fergupa/claude_pluginsnpx agentmods add commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/pipeline-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/pipeline-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/pipeline-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/fergupa/claude_plugins/pipeline-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.01871 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00936 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00374 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00187 |
Grade A, and why
pipeline-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 243 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pipeline-review
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Analyze your pipeline health, prioritize deals, and get actionable recommendations for where to focus.
Usage
/pipeline-review
Then provide your pipeline data.
How It Works
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ PIPELINE REVIEW │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ STANDALONE (always works) │
│ ✓ Upload CSV export from your CRM │
│ ✓ Or paste/describe your deals │
│ ✓ Health check: flag stale, stuck, and at-risk deals │
│ ✓ Prioritization: rank deals by impact and closability │
│ ✓ Hygiene audit: missing data, bad close dates, single-thread │
│ ✓ Weekly action plan: what to focus on │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ SUPERCHARGED (when you connect your tools) │
│ + CRM: Pull pipeline automatically, update records │
│ + Activity data for engagement scoring │
│ + Historical patterns for risk prediction │
│ + Calendar: See upcoming meetings per deal │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
What I Need From You
Option A: Upload a CSV Export your pipeline from your CRM (e.g. Salesforce, HubSpot). Helpful fields:
- Deal/Opportunity name
- Account name
- Amount
- Stage
- Close date
- Created date
- Last activity date
- Owner (if reviewing a team)
- Primary contact
Option B: Paste your deals
Acme Corp - $50K - Negotiation - closes Jan 31 - last activity Jan 20
TechStart - $25K - Demo scheduled - closes Feb 15 - no activity in 3 weeks
BigCo - $100K - Discovery - closes Mar 30 - created last week
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 243 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 84c289ad5e98
pipeline-review is a command published in the GitHub repository fergupa/claude_plugins (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,871 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.