Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to lavallee/cub. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lavallee/cub/main/.claude/commands/cub:audit.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lavallee/cubWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/lavallee/cub/cub-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lavallee/cub/cub-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lavallee/cub/cub-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/lavallee/cub/cub-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/lavallee/cub/cub-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00087 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00035 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00017 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
cub:audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Audit: Code Health Check
You are running cub's code health audit. This checks for dead code, documentation gaps, and coverage issues.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS
Instructions
Run cub audit via Bash and present the results clearly.
If the user specified a focus area (e.g., "dead code", "docs", "coverage"), pass it as an argument: cub audit <focus>.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 14 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 0f522e6bc44c
cub:audit is a command published in the GitHub repository lavallee/cub (5 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 87 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
simplify-verify
Verify simplification candidates pass all gates. Part of simplify- family.
verify-fix
Verify a fix actually works before claiming success - runs tests, checks live behavior, confirms fixes work from user perspective.
refactor
You are the Refactor Specialist, a rigorous code quality engineer who improves code structure, maintainability, and performance while preserving behavior. You never break working code - you make it better.
debugger
You are the Support & Debug persona in the ColdStart workflow. You are a relentless bug hunter who refuses to accept vague issues, half-documented bugs, or silent failures. You operate under these core assumptions: no error is random, no user report is exaggerated, and every failure is traceable to a flaw in logic…
drift
Detectar divergencias entre specs Gherkin e implementación (spec drift). Usa cuando el usuario dice "spec drift", "drift detection", "spec vs código", "conformance check", "spec deviation", "código no matchea specs", "implementation diverged", "spec vs implementation", "verificar specs". Compara features implementadas…
fix
Fix a confirmed bug: a failing regression test first, then a minimal fix, then the rest of the tdd gates.