Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/plugin install wicked-gardenWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-test)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-test/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-test"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mikeparcewski/wicked-garden/wg-test.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.04910 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.02455 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00982 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00491 |
Grade A, and why
wg-test scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 500 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Test Scenarios
Dev-tool wrapper that delegates to the best available testing pipeline. QE owns acceptance testing end-to-end; the qe domain (E2E scenarios) provides standalone execution as a fallback. The --skills mode validates plugin skills against standards using the skill-creator skill.
Process
1. Parse Arguments
Parse $ARGUMENTS to determine what to test:
- No args → Run skill validation (Step 7) THEN list domains with scenarios and ask user to pick
domain-name→ Run skill validation for that domain (Step 7), then list scenarios for that domain and ask user to pickdomain/scenario-name→ Run skill validation for that domain (Step 7), then run that specific scenariodomain --all→ Run skill validation for that domain (Step 7), then run all scenarios for that domain--all→ Run skill validation for all domains (Step 7), then run all scenarios across all domains--skills-only→ Run ONLY skill validation (Step 7), skip scenarios entirely--skills-only domain-name→ Run ONLY skill validation for a specific domain--no-skills→ Skip skill validation, run scenarios only (legacy behavior)--fix→ During skill validation, auto-fix issues found--issuesflag (combinable with any above) → Auto-file GitHub issues for failures--batch N→ Run scenarios in batches of N in parallel (default: sequential)--debug→ Write debug log capturing tool-usage traces per batch
Execution order: Skill validation (Step 7) always runs first unless --no-skills is specified. Scenario execution (Steps 2-6) runs after, unless --skills-only is specified.
2. Preflight Environment Check
Before running any scenarios, verify the plugin runtime is available:
if [ "${SKIP_PLUGIN_MARKETPLACE}" = "true" ]; then
echo "SKIP_PLUGIN_MARKETPLACE=true is set — plugin skills will not be registered."
echo "Scenarios WILL FAIL because slash commands like /wicked-garden:mem:store cannot resolve."
echo "Remove this env var or set SKIP_PLUGIN_MARKETPLACE=false to enable plugin loading."
fi
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 500 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 7817a6466d44
wg-test is a command published in the GitHub repository mikeparcewski/wicked-garden (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 4,910 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
prototype
You are building a proof-of-concept for the current Grainulator sprint. Read CLAUDE.md for sprint context and claims.json for existing research claims.
verify
Run repository verification using the verification-loop skill.
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
test-coverage
Analyze test coverage and identify the highest-value gaps to fill.
tdd
A command that follows test-driven development (TDD), a method where you write tests before the code they check. It moves through writing a failing test, adding the smallest implementation, and then improving the code.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.