Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/mverab/eGEOagentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/mverab/egeoagents/geo-compete)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/mverab/egeoagents/geo-compete"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/mverab/egeoagents/geo-compete.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00220 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00110 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00044 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
geo:compete scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/geo:compete Command
Competitive analysis for AI-engine rankings.
Workflow
- Validate MCPs - Run
validation-doctor; if missing, provide setup snippets - Query Analysis - Understand user intent
- Competitor Discovery - Use Brave results when available; otherwise fallback to best-effort (Low Confidence)
- Gap Analysis - Identify differentiation opportunities
- Strategy - Recommend positioning
Output
Competitive analysis report:
- Top results for query (Brave-backed; otherwise Low Confidence)
- Strengths/weaknesses of each
- Your positioning opportunities
- Specific differentiation strategies
Example Usage
/geo:compete "best project management software"
/geo:compete "how to automate invoicing"
/geo:compete "enterprise data analytics platform"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 37 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A ff02907cafcf
geo:compete is a command published in the GitHub repository mverab/eGEOagents (175 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 220 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
seo-geo
SEO/GEO end-to-end along the SITE loop: survey demand and competitors, implement content, tune quality/tech/on-page, and evaluate authority/rankings/reports/memory (--phase survey|implement|tune|evaluate). Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
ad
Run a paid-ads (ROAS) workflow: audience segments, account structure, ad creative, experiment design, pre-launch signal QA + the account-audit gate, measurement, and attribution. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
Run an email-marketing (SEND) workflow: deliverability/consent setup, segmentation, email creative, lifecycle flows, newsletter monetization, send-testing, and the email-quality audit gate. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
influencer
Run an influencer-marketing (STAR) workflow: audience & creator scouting, campaign targeting, briefs, outreach, amplification, and ROI reporting. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
launch
Run a product-launch (RAMP) workflow: positioning and launch tiering, window/early-access design, message house and asset kits, the launch-readiness gate with a T-1 go/no-go, launch-day execution, and the post-launch prove loop. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.
narrative
Run a brand-narrative & messaging (TALE) workflow: trace the current message and positioning truth, architect the durable message house/voice/story canon, land it consistently across every surface, and evaluate resonance with tests and drift monitoring. Not sure? Use /aaron-marketing:auto.