Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift-online/gcp-hcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/address-reviews)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/address-reviews"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/address-reviews/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/address-reviews"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openshift-online/gcp-hcp/address-reviews.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00236 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
address-reviews scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the author-code-review agent using the Task tool with subagent_type="author-code-review".
Pass the following context to the agent:
- PR number: Parse from $ARGUMENTS if provided, otherwise show all open PRs for selection
- Execution mode: "batch" for batch mode, "loop" for continuous mode, otherwise interactive
The agent will:
- Find all my open PRs in this repository
- Analyze review comments (including CoderabbitAI)
- Identify actionable code change requests
- Implement the requested changes
- Run verification using repo-appropriate commands
- Commit and push fixes
If execution mode is "batch", run in batch mode - do not ask for confirmation. If execution mode is "loop", run in loop mode - continuously process until no actionable comments remain. Otherwise, run in interactive mode - confirm with me before making changes and before pushing.
$ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 27 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A b1227f42276a
address-reviews is a command published in the GitHub repository openshift-online/gcp-hcp (2 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 236 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.
security-review
AI-powered security review of the current git diff (or specified paths). Dispatches the security-reviewer agent and prints findings grouped by severity.