Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to sillsdev/FieldWorks. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/sillsdev/FieldWorks/main/.github/prompts/dotnet-design-pattern-review.prompt.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/sillsdev/FieldWorksWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/sillsdev/fieldworks/dotnet-design-pattern-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sillsdev/fieldworks/dotnet-design-pattern-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sillsdev/fieldworks/dotnet-design-pattern-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/sillsdev/fieldworks/dotnet-design-pattern-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/sillsdev/fieldworks/dotnet-design-pattern-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.00622 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
dotnet-design-pattern-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A b6d1349a8bd5
dotnet-design-pattern-review is a command published in the GitHub repository sillsdev/FieldWorks (110 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 622 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-06.
Other commands, from other repositories
dotnet-teach
One-time setup that scans a .NET backend project, learns its conventions and architecture, and writes them to CLAUDE.md for future sessions.
dotnet-structure
Analyze and recommend .NET backend solution and folder structure improvements. Checks projects, layers, oversized files, and boundary clarity.
code-simplify
Simplify C# code for clarity and maintainability — reduce complexity without changing behavior.
dotnet-code-review
You are an experienced .NET software engineer conducting a thorough code review. Focus exclusively on the changes being introduced (the diff), not on pre-existing code unless it's directly affected by the changes.
cli-review
Review Rust CLI applications for UX, error handling, testing, and cross-platform compatibility.
kotlin-review
Comprehensive Kotlin code review for idiomatic patterns, null safety, coroutine safety, and security. Invokes the kotlin-reviewer agent.