Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/spencermarx/open-code-review/code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/spencermarx/open-code-reviewWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00147 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to code-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
code-review
Automated code review with swarm intelligence.
Usage
npx claude-flow github code-review [options]
Options
--pr-number <n>- Pull request to review--focus <areas>- Review focus (security, performance, style)--suggest-fixes- Suggest code fixes
Examples
# Review PR
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456
# Security focus
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456 --focus security
# With fix suggestions
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456 --suggest-fixes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c1bc7608b43a
code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository spencermarx/open-code-review (349 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 147 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to code-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
api-mock
You are an API mocking expert specializing in creating realistic mock services for development, testing, and demonstration purposes. Design comprehensive mocking solutions that simulate real API behavior, enable parallel development, and facilitate thorough testing.
update-changelog-and-tag
You are preparing a release. Follow these steps precisely.
test-feature
Test a React Native feature on the running simulator/emulator. Verifies UI, user flows, and internal state. Generates a persistent Maestro test file.
assistant-auto
Orchestrator in automatic mode. Choose the workflow that semantically fits based on the request + the injected repo context, then execute immediately via Skill.
doctor
Diagnose installation health. Check Node, CDP bridge, rn-fast-runner (iOS), rn-android-runner (Android), maestro-runner, simulators, Metro, CDP, injected helpers, ffmpeg, physical devices, plugin version, Vercel rules sync. Reports what's missing — does NOT modify your project.
fix-issue
!gh issue view $ARGUMENTS 2>/dev/null || echo "Could not fetch issue $ARGUMENTS".