Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add instructions/khaoss85/agent-crm/agents-mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/khaoss85/agent-crmWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/instructions/khaoss85/agent-crm/agents-md)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/instructions/khaoss85/agent-crm/agents-md"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/instructions/khaoss85/agent-crm/agents-md.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.03033 | $0.03033 |
| Opus 5 | $0.01517 | $0.01517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00607 | $0.00607 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00303 | $0.00303 |
Grade A, and why
agent-crm AGENTS.md scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 160 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Repository guidance
Product intent
This repository is an agent-native CRM framework. Preserve the separation between deterministic CRM state and AI-assisted development/orchestration.
Required workflow
- Read
PRODUCT.md,ARCHITECTURE.md,DECISIONS.mdand the relevant module files before changing code. Before product, positioning, roadmap or public-distribution decisions, readdocs/strategy/MASTER_PLAN.mdfirst; for implementation details,ARCHITECTURE.mdandDECISIONS.mdremain authoritative. - For a multi-file feature or significant refactor, create and maintain an ExecPlan under
docs/plans/following.agent/PLANS.md. - Use public module services and named workflows. Never mutate CRM tables from API, MCP or UI code.
- Any write operation must retain validation, audit and trace.
- Keep MCP write tools narrow; destructive or code-generating tools must default to dry-run or require an explicit apply flag.
- Do not add a production dependency unless it removes more complexity than it adds; record the reason in
DECISIONS.md. - Run
npm run verifybefore considering work complete. - Update
TASKS.mdand relevant docs when behavior changes. - Domain-package work requires the
build-custom-domain-packageskill (.claude/skills/build-custom-domain-package/SKILL.md, mirrored at.agents/skills/build-custom-domain-package/SKILL.md) anddocs/PACKAGE_AUTHORING.md. A package imports onlypackages/core/index.js, reaches another package only through a declared capability, and is registered by one static import inpackages/domains/generated/index.js. A single custom object is a module, not a package. - Follow
docs/QUALITY_GATES.mdfor every feature PR, and use theadversarial-reviewskill for any milestone review or pre-merge review task (.claude/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md, mirrored at.agents/skills/adversarial-review/SKILL.md). A milestone that skipped the review is unreviewed, not finished. - Respect the core budget rule (ADR-018): new domain-specific business behavior does not go into
packages/coreunless it is first proven to be a reusable runtime capability. A PR that adds a domain concept to core must say which runtime capability it is and why a domain package cannot own it. - Read
docs/PROJECT_STATUS.mdfor what is true in the repository today — merged milestone, the commit the public numbers were measured at, open PRs, production blockers — and update it in the same PR as a milestone merge. Do not put volatile status inMASTER_PLAN.md. It carries no test count: a count is measured intosite/claims.jsonmeasuredAgainstbynode scripts/measure-suite.js --applyand cited from there (ADR-027). Typing one into any document underdocs/failsnpm run gtm:check. - To learn what an application actually has, run
npm run crm -- app inspect --jsonrather than assembling it from source and prose (docs/APPLICATION_INSPECTION.md). Readvalid, thenproblems[], thenlimitations[]— every limitation is a hard boundary on what you may claim. It reads checked-in source only: it opens no database, contacts no provider, and reports no runtime or authorization state. - Compatibility Backfill Rule. When you add or change a horizontal capability — one every domain could use, such as the package seam, a declared capability contract, module evolution, an evidence discipline or an agent-facing surface — record every existing domain's status against it in
docs/architecture/LEGACY_ALIGNMENT_MATRIX.mdin the same PR, usingaligned | partial | deferred | not_applicable | needs_extractionwith a one-line reason. Declaring the gap is required; closing it in the same PR is not. Do not refactor a legacy domain to close a row: extraction is sequenced work (docs/architecture/LEGACY_ALIGNMENT_MATRIX.md), not something a feature PR does on the way past. - A Solution Plan is a checked file with a contract, not prose with headings (
docs/SOLUTION_PLAN.md). Write it, record theapp inspectreport it was written against, and runnpm run crm -- solution check <plan.json>before writing code and again before the review — a plan bound to a composition that has since moved reportsPLAN_STALE. A plan never carries a command: nothing in this framework executes one, and the validator refuses it. - Parallel coding agents. Each agent works in its own sibling worktree outside the repository, owns exactly one branch, and one final integrator reconciles the shared truth. The three rules are in Parallel coding agents below.
- The Repository Truth Contract (ADR-039). A sentence in a current document that states what the framework does or does not do is bound to a fact generated from an executable authority, and cited by stable fact id —
<!-- truth: spine.managed_jobs_service.implemented=absent -->. Existing gates compare documents to documents, and that is exactly how a whole set of them stayed consistently wrong together after Production Spine v1.npm run repo:truth -- --checkruns on every push and pull request as its own step in thepublic-claimsCI job; run it locally when a PR moves a product boundary, a rail, a package contract or the spine, and if a fact moved, runnpm run repo:truthand commit the regenerateddocs/repository-truth.jsonin the same PR. It is a repository-maintenance script, not a rail and not a product command: it adds nothing to the surface budget and never leaves this repository. Rules and boundaries:docs/REPOSITORY_TRUTH.md,docs/QUALITY_GATES.md§6.1.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +1 tokens per session b3ae120f22e4
- 4d ago First seen · 160 lines · 3,032 tokens per session scan A 28e4b8dd4c61
agent-crm AGENTS.md is an instructions file published in the GitHub repository khaoss85/agent-crm (2 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 3,033 tokens to every session, about $0.0152 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other instructions, from other repositories
ai-workbench-mcp AGENTS.md
AGENTS.md instructions for hrishikesh-thakre/ai-workbench-mcp, covering agents.md, repository summary, read first, working rules and current direction.
matt-skills-with-to-goal CLAUDE.md
Instructions for tt-a1i/matt-skills-with-to-goal: Skills are organized into bucket folders under skills/.
ephemeral-sandbox CLAUDE.md
Instructions for Ephemeral-AI-Lab/ephemeral-sandbox, covering claude.md, project, engineering practice (required), build & test and sandbox tools.
coral CLAUDE.md
Instructions for cdknorow/coral, covering claude.md - coral go, mission, testing, go unit tests and legacy parity tools (historical reference).
pixir CLAUDE.md
Instructions for Ranvier-Technologies/pixir, covering pixir harness - legacy agent guide, current map and commands.
Agent-Memory-Bridge AGENTS.md
Instructions for zzhang82/Agent-Memory-Bridge, covering agent memory bridge contributor instructions, setup and checks, architecture boundaries, mutation and migration invariants and benchmark expectations.