rigorous-paper-reviewer

rigorous-paper-reviewer is a plugin for Claude Code from shubham0704/claude-skills. Its manifest loads nothing; the 1 skill it bundles cost 128 tokens per session together, scanned A, original, MIT.

A review tool for LaTeX research papers that checks technical content in seven passes, including structure, notation, proofs, calculations, complexity, figures, and overall flow. It also includes a Python script for finding broken labels, references, and structural issues.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review mathematical or machine-learning papers, check theorem and proof presentation, inspect numerical claims, and automatically triage document-structure errors.
Why use it?
It helps uncover technical mistakes and consistency problems that a general proofreading pass may miss.

Plugin for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code plugin manifest.

Good fit Use it to review mathematical or machine-learning papers, check theorem and proof presentation, inspect numerical claims, and automatically triage document-structure errors.

Compare 6 plugins from other repositories ↓
Install in Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add shubham0704/claude-skills/plugin install rigorous-paper-reviewer
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/shubham0704/claude-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for rigorous-paper-reviewer

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-reviewer/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/plugins/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-reviewer)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for rigorous-paper-reviewer

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/plugins/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/plugins/shubham0704/claude-skills/rigorous-paper-reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session not measured What this adds to a session before it is invoked.
When invoked not measured The manifest loads nothing itself; its 1 skill cost 128 tokens a session between them.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Security

Grade A, and why

rigorous-paper-reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

rigorous-paper-reviewer/.claude-plugin/plugin.json · 12 lines

What it actually says

{
  "name": "rigorous-paper-reviewer",
  "description": "Deep 7-pass technical review of LaTeX papers — structure, notation, theorem/proof, numerics, complexity, figures, coherence. Includes a static Python verifier for automated triage of labels, cross-references, and structure.",
  "version": "1.0.0",
  "author": {
    "name": "Shubham",
    "url": "https://github.com/shubham0704"
  },
  "homepage": "https://github.com/shubham0704/claude-skills/tree/main/rigorous-paper-reviewer",
  "license": "MIT"
}
Contents

What it installs

The manifest is a name and a version. 1 skill travel with it, and installing the plugin installs all of them — 128 tokens a session between them. Each is measured on its own page, and each can be installed alone.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 12 lines scan A 7cf4530bf269

Subscribe to this mod's changes

rigorous-paper-reviewer is a plugin published in the GitHub repository shubham0704/claude-skills (1 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. Its token cost is not measured: this kind of file is read by the harness, not the model. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other plugins, from other repositories

superjawn

Research-augmented fork of obra/superpowers. Ships all 14 workflow skills (brainstorming, planning, TDD, code review, debugging, worktrees, parallel agents) standalone, with no dependency on the upstream superpowers plugin.

jamditis/claude-skills-journalism · not measured

academic-skills-food-nutrition

Original, MIT-licensed academic skills for food, nutrition & agricultural science: research, journal-aware writing, peer review, and end-to-end orchestration, plus publisher-tiered journal author-guideline skills (food, nutrition, agriculture Q1/Q2, and multidisciplinary) and a scientific figure workflow, for Claude…

PangenomeAI/academic-skills-food-nutrition · not measured

rad-code-review

The specialist lanes and memory that the built-in /code-review doesn't have. Invokes the built-in engine for general bug-finding (quick/standard/deep map to its effort levels), then adds what it lacks: a mechanical hallucinated-imports validator (lockfile-verified across Python/JS/TS/Rust/Go, with a vendored denylist…

RadOrigin-LLC/RAD-Claude-Skills · not measured

rebuttal-skills

Two composable Claude Code skills for writing peer-review rebuttals: write-rebuttal (overall process — Parikh–Batra–Lee method, 18 tactics, AC-facing structure) and nlp-rebuttal (per-concern playbook — 28 reviewer-concern scenarios with answer templates).

yuangao-tum/rebuttal-skills · not measured

ieee-skills

Bilingual skills for writing IEEE communications-journal papers (JSAC, TWC, TC/TCOM, WCL, CL): literature search with DOI/BibTeX verification, drafting with target-journal routing, learning-based and emerging-paradigm system models, reproducible methods, language polishing, IEEE citation/IEEEtran formatting…

TenWalk/ieee-skills · not measured

paper-sharpener

Academic paper review and writing improvement skills for Claude Code.

borgr/paper-sharpener · not measured