Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/alkoleft/platform-context-exporterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/command-execution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/command-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/command-execution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/command-execution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/alkoleft/platform-context-exporter/command-execution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.02228 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00891 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00446 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00223 |
Grade A, and why
command-execution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to command-execution — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 235 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
COMMAND EXECUTION SYSTEM
TL;DR: This system provides guidelines for efficient command execution, balancing clarity and token optimization through appropriate command chaining, with proper documentation of commands and results.
🔍 COMMAND EFFICIENCY WORKFLOW
graph TD
Start["Command<br>Planning"] --> Analyze["Analyze Command<br>Requirements"]
Analyze --> Balance["Balance Clarity<br>vs. Efficiency"]
Balance --> Complexity{"Command<br>Complexity?"}
Complexity -->|"Simple"| Single["Execute<br>Single Command"]
Complexity -->|"Moderate"| Chain["Use Efficient<br>Command Chaining"]
Complexity -->|"Complex"| Group["Group Into<br>Logical Steps"]
Single & Chain & Group --> Verify["Verify<br>Results"]
Verify --> Document["Document<br>Command & Result"]
Document --> Next["Next<br>Command"]
📋 COMMAND CHAINING GUIDELINES
graph TD
Command["Command<br>Execution"] --> ChainApprop{"Is Chaining<br>Appropriate?"}
ChainApprop -->|"Yes"| ChainTypes["Chain<br>Types"]
ChainApprop -->|"No"| SingleCmd["Use Single<br>Commands"]
ChainTypes --> Sequential["Sequential Operations<br>cmd1 && cmd2"]
ChainTypes --> Conditional["Conditional Operations<br>cmd1 || cmd2"]
ChainTypes --> Piping["Piping<br>cmd1 | cmd2"]
ChainTypes --> Grouping["Command Grouping<br>(cmd1; cmd2)"]
Sequential & Conditional & Piping & Grouping --> Doc["Document<br>Commands & Results"]
🚦 DIRECTORY VERIFICATION WORKFLOW
graph TD
Command["Command<br>Execution"] --> DirCheck["Check Current<br>Directory"]
DirCheck --> ProjectRoot{"In Project<br>Root?"}
ProjectRoot -->|"Yes"| Execute["Execute<br>Command"]
ProjectRoot -->|"No"| Locate["Locate<br>Project Root"]
Locate --> Found{"Project Root<br>Found?"}
Found -->|"Yes"| Navigate["Navigate to<br>Project Root"]
Found -->|"No"| Error["Error: Cannot<br>Find Project Root"]
Navigate --> Execute
Execute --> Verify["Verify<br>Results"]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 235 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3f88c33ce358
command-execution is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository alkoleft/platform-context-exporter (48 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,228 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to command-execution, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
1c-coding-standards
Coding standards for BSL, the programming language used by the 1C business software platform. They cover naming, method documentation, database queries, collections, client-server code, and performance practices.
code-review-checklist
A code-review checklist for 1C source files, including BSL and OS files. It groups findings by severity and checks issues such as security, performance, errors, access control, duplication, and maintainability.
bsl-ssl
A set of rules for developing 1C applications built on БСП, the Russian-language Standard Subsystems Library. It tells developers when to reuse library functionality, how to mark changes, and how to handle outdated objects.
1c-mdo-integrity
Rules for keeping 1C EDT MDO files structurally valid. MDO files describe configuration objects, and the rules cover unique identifiers and valid links between objects.
1c-report-direct-query
A 1C reporting rule that runs the report query directly instead of using the standard data-composition engine (СКД). It then displays or exports the returned table manually.
1c-skd-two-pass-preprocessing
A two-pass method for changing 1C report output before detailed records are combined into grouped totals. 1C's report system, СКД, builds reports by grouping and summarizing data.