subagents

Rules for choosing and dispatching specialist agents, such as developers, reviewers, planners, researchers, and auditors.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use them when deciding which agent should handle planning, coding, review, terminal operations, architecture checks, or recovery.
Why use it?
They keep each kind of work with the appropriate agent and restrict coordinators to their permitted orchestration tasks.

Cursor rule for Cursor

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add rules/budagov-lab/dreamteam/subagents
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/budagov-lab/DreamTeam

Made for: Cursor.

Per session 0 Nothing until a file matches its globs; then the whole rule loads.
When invoked 354 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00354
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00177
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00071
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00035

Measured yesterday against content hash 3805c11d2f70, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

subagents scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.cursor/rules/subagents.mdc · 41 lines

What it actually says

Subagent Dispatch

When Left or Right need to dispatch a subagent:

Load the appropriate agent prompt from .cursor/agents/ — each agent has its own file. Full dispatch rules and agent list: .cursor/AGENTS.md

Dispatch via mcp_task

Use mcp_task with the correct subagent_type:

Agent subagent_type
Developer developer
Reviewer reviewer
Git-Ops git-ops
Planner planner
Sub-Planner planner-sub (Planner only, not Left/Right)
Researcher researcher
Meta Planner meta-planner
Auditor auditor
Learning learning
FixPlanner fix-planner
DevExperiencer dev-experiencer
Terminal shell
Left orchestrator-left (Dispatcher only)
Right orchestrator-right (Dispatcher only)

Left/Right Terminal Commands (Orchestration Only)

Left and Right run Terminal (shell) subagent ONLY for: set-goal, verify-tasks, verify-integrity, task-counter, run-next, update-task, sync-tasks, recover, memory-to-files, check-memory, vector-index, subagent-calls

All other work goes to the appropriate specialized agent.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 41 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3805c11d2f70

Subscribe to this mod's changes

subagents is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository budagov-lab/DreamTeam (1 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 354 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.