Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/snoozbuster/is-smm-beaten-yetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/snoozbuster/is-smm-beaten-yet/viewer-caution)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/snoozbuster/is-smm-beaten-yet/viewer-caution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/snoozbuster/is-smm-beaten-yet/viewer-caution/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/snoozbuster/is-smm-beaten-yet/viewer-caution"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/snoozbuster/is-smm-beaten-yet/viewer-caution.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00287 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00115 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00057 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00029 |
Grade A, and why
viewer-caution scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Viewer caution
The viewer/ directory is a fork of leomaurodesenv/smm-course-viewer. It contains untyped JavaScript that parses and draws SMM1 level files (.cdt). See viewer/README.md for full context.
Critical:
-
Untyped JS: ESLint runs on
.jsbut there is no TypeScript type checking. Changes to viewer code and its call sites (e.g.LevelPreview.vue,scripts/extract-course-data.js) must be manually checked so APIs and return shapes line up. -
Binary parsing: Parsing in
viewer/SmmCourseViewer.jsis order- and format-sensitive. Do not change the order or semantics of parsing logic; the code must do exactly what it does in the same order every time.
Do: Prefer not touching parsing; if you must, make minimal, well-reasoned edits and verify manually.
Don't: Reorder parsing steps, change byte/field interpretation, or assume TypeScript/lint will catch viewer ↔ caller mismatches.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 20 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e895a525ceea
viewer-caution is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository snoozbuster/is-smm-beaten-yet (43 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 287 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
meta-quest-agentic-tools
Use Meta Quest Agentic Tools for Meta Quest and Horizon OS samples.
narrative-writing
A set of rules for writing and editing video-game narratives, connected to a narrative project. It requires the agent to load the project's writing context and story canon, which is the established set of story facts, before making changes.
meta-quest-agentic-tools
Use Meta Quest Agentic Tools for Meta Quest and Horizon OS samples.
visual-and-observational-rules
Defines the visual aspects of the game and how the player observes the world. This includes map color-coding, screen effects, and the overall simulation style.
00-project-overview
Base project rule — purpose, constraints, and defaults for mcp-5etools.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.