5 tagged llm-debate, measured the same way as everything else here.
Plugin Claude Code
Multi-agent adversarial review panel — 4-6 AI reviewers debate your code/plans, then a judge delivers a structured verdict with epistemic labels. Bundles plan-review-integrator for applying review findings back into implementation plans.
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Orchestrate a multi-agent adversarial review panel: subagents with different perspectives independently review, debate and discuss, reach or fail consensus, then a supreme judge renders the verdict. Trigger on "review panel", "multi-agent review", "adversarial review", "panel review", "have agents debate this", "get…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Integrate structured review panel findings into an implementation plan document. Takes output from agent-review-panel (or any structured review with severity-rated findings) and cross-references each finding against the plan, classifies it into an action category, applies concrete edits, and produces a traceability…
Skill Claude CodeCodex
Adversarial specification writer. Takes a brief (from grill-me or user) and produces a structured spec.md with YAML frontmatter, requirements, acceptance criteria, and target files. Git-aware pipeline: each run on its own branch, squash-merge on approval.
Cursor rule Cursor
A multi-model deliberation system for planning and analysis questions.