Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/visionTw/godot-ai-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/rules/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/godot-core-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/godot-core-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/godot-core-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/rules/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/godot-core-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/rules/visiontw/godot-ai-harness/godot-core-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.00098 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00049 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00020 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
godot-core-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Godot Core Workflow
- 涉及运行验证、调试输出、运行时行为时,优先使用 MCP。
- 功能改动后至少执行一次 smoke 检查并记录结果。
- 阶段性任务必须回写开发日志与测试证据。
- 默认不做远端 push;仅在用户明确要求时提交和推送。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 12 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 2feed5053267
godot-core-workflow is a cursor rule published in the GitHub repository visionTw/godot-ai-harness (2 stars, last pushed 21d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other cursor rules, from other repositories
decky-screenshot-ingest
When debugging Decky or Steam Deck UI, ingest local screenshots using the decky-screenshot-ingest skill.
dragonruby-error-handling
Defines error handling and validation strategies within Ruby code in DragonRuby projects.
ponytail
Ponytail, lazy senior dev mode. Always pick the simplest solution that works.
angular-20
This rule provides comprehensive best practices and coding standards for Angular development, focusing on modern TypeScript, standalone components, signals, and performance optimizations.
dev-standard
Apache Superset development standards and guidelines for Cursor IDE.
cli-error-handling
CLI command error handling patterns.