Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0dayInc/pwn --skill curriculumgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0dayInc/pwnWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0dayinc/pwn/curriculum)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0dayinc/pwn/curriculum"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0dayinc/pwn/curriculum/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0dayinc/pwn/curriculum"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0dayinc/pwn/curriculum.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.00790 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00316 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
pwn-ai-agent-curriculum scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 59 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PWN::AI::Agent::Curriculum
PWN::AI::Agent::Curriculum is Tier 4/5 of the pwn-ai reinforcement loop — the SELF-PLAY layer that turns the agent from a passive experience-recorder into an active learner: S1 .practice — Mistake-driven auto-curriculum. Reads Mistakes.top(unresolved), asks Reflect to generate 3 minimal reproducer prompts per signature, self-plays each under Loop.run, and auto-mistakes_resolve when Reward.judge says the practice run solved it. THE AGENT PRACTISES ITS OWN WEAKNESSES OVERNIGHT. S2 .counterfactual — On a repeated in-turn failure, forks: branch A continues with the correction_hint, branch B asks an alt persona for a different tool. Reward.judge picks the winner; (loser, winner) → Reward.record_preference. Real advantage estimation, not imagined rollouts. S3 .critic — Constitutional critic persona with TOOL ACCESS (can shell/extro_verify the claim). Runs BEFORE note_outcome; its verdict feeds Reward.judge and its concrete flaw becomes a preference pair when the agent self-corrects. S4 .red_team_plan — After plan_first, an adversarial persona reviews the plan against THIS host's Metrics/Mistakes/extro_drift and injects a pre-emptive correction_hint on the step it predicts will fail. C3 .hindsight — Hindsight Experience Replay. On failure, asks the judge "what DID this trajectory accomplish?", relabels the episode with the achieved-goal as success:true. Free positive samples from failures — first HER on real tool traces. W2 .train_and_gate — export_finetune + export_dpo → local LoRA (unsloth/axolotl if installed) → replay Mistakes.top on vN vs vN+1 → promote iff resolved(N+1) > resolved(N). Fully autonomous weight-level self-improvement with a regression gate. W3 .calibrate — Tracks plan_first predicted p(success) vs actual outcome → Brier score in Metrics. All entry points are cron-safe (never raise into the caller) and depth-guarded via Swarm's Thread.current[:pwn_swarm_depth] so a curriculum run cannot recurse into itself.
When to use
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 59 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 896e08d38ae7
pwn-ai-agent-curriculum is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0dayInc/pwn (86 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 790 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
pwn-ai-agent-curriculum compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pwn-ai-agent-curriculum0dayInc/pwn | Skill | 86 | today | MIT | A | 23 | Claude Code |
| osmedeus-expertj3ssie/osmedeus | Skill | 6.6k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 113 | Claude Code, Codex |
| performing-jwt-none-algorithm-attackxalgorix/xalgorix | Skill | 1.3k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 34 | Claude Code, Codex |
| performing-ai-assisted-vulnerability-discoveryxalgorix/xalgorix | Skill | 1.3k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 91 | Claude Code, Codex |
| analyzing-linux-elf-malwaremukul975/Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills | Skill | 36k | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | B | 82 | Claude Code |
| supabasePentesterFlow/agent | Skill | 1.4k | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 120 | Claude Code |
| graphqlPentesterFlow/agent | Skill | 1.4k | 2mo ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 75 | Claude Code |