Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add 0xmariowu/Autosearch --skill arxivgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/0xmariowu/AutosearchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xmariowu/autosearch/arxiv)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xmariowu/autosearch/arxiv"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0xmariowu/autosearch/arxiv/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/0xmariowu/autosearch/arxiv"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/0xmariowu/autosearch/arxiv.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00606 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00242 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00121 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
arxiv scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill Attribution
Source: self-written, plan
autosearch-0418-channels-and-skills.md§ F002c.
name: arxiv description: Use for academic preprint searches in CS/ML/physics when query is English or mixed and expects peer-reviewed or preprint papers. version: 1 languages: [en] methods:
- id: api_search impl: methods/api_search.py requires: [] rate_limit: {per_min: 30, per_hour: 500} fallback_chain: [api_search] when_to_use: query_languages: [en, mixed] query_types: [academic, research-paper, literature-review, survey] avoid_for: [news, product-review, real-time] quality_hint: typical_yield: medium-high chinese_native: false layer: leaf domains: [academic] scenarios: [preprint, latest-paper, literature-review] model_tier: Fast experience_digest: experience.md
Overview
arXiv is the core discovery surface for open academic preprints in computer science, machine learning, mathematics, and physics. It is useful when the user wants papers, author names, abstracts, and recent literature rather than social discussion or product sentiment.
For autosearch coverage, this channel gives the planner a clean paper-oriented source with predictable metadata and low noise. It complements web search by making research intent explicit and by supporting literature-review style queries that should not route to news or community channels.
When to Choose It
- Choose it for English or mixed-language paper lookup on topics like model architectures, benchmarks, safety methods, or optimization techniques.
- Choose it when the user asks for research papers, surveys, or literature review material rather than blog posts.
- Choose it when titles, authors, abstracts, and paper identifiers are more important than commentary.
- Avoid it for breaking news, shopping advice, or fast-moving public opinion.
How To Search (Planned)
api_search- Query the arXiv API search endpoint with keyword and category filters, then parse Atom feed results into normalized paper evidence.api_search- Expected fields include title, authors, summary, published date, primary category, and canonical arXiv URL.api_search- Initial ranking should favor exact topic matches and recent relevant submissions for literature-review workflows.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 60 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3f7126e37b7e
arxiv is a skill published in the GitHub repository 0xmariowu/Autosearch (54 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 606 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
qec-construct
Verifier-in-the-loop CONSTRUCTION of quantum error-correcting codes with transversal non-Clifford gates (CCZ/T). Applies whenever the project goal is a new or better code/construction — INCLUDING search-phrased goals ("find codes beating X"), where the construct-loop (propose algebraic rule → qverify → debug) is the…
paper-search
Search, download, and read academic papers from 20+ sources (arXiv, PubMed, Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, etc). Use when the user asks to find papers, search for research, look up academic literature, download a paper PDF, or extract text from a paper.
assumption-audit
Surface all assumptions, classify by vulnerability (load-bearing × likely-false), validate causal logic. Focus on dangerous assumptions — high load-bearing + non-explicit.
analogical-discovery
Abstract relational structure from source domains, map it to the target, validate depth, and instantiate transferable mechanisms.
adjust-abstraction-scope
Move a scientific object up/down in abstraction or narrow/broaden selected scope dimensions (population, mechanism, context, outcome, timeframe, system boundary) until the representation has useful explanatory and experimental leverage.
define-evidence-protocol
Define research questions, evidence scope, queries/concepts, inclusion/exclusion rules, provenance requirements, and stopping evidence for an acquisition task.