Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ace3000chao/book2startup --skill rockefeller-habitsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ace3000chao/book2startupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/rockefeller-habits)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/rockefeller-habits"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/rockefeller-habits/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/rockefeller-habits"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ace3000chao/book2startup/rockefeller-habits.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00099 | $0.02302 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.01151 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00460 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00230 |
Grade A, and why
rockefeller-habits scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Rockefeller Habits 执行力习惯清单
R — 原文 (Reading)
"There are 10 fundamental habits that support the successful execution of your strategy — habits that haven't changed for 100 years since John D. Rockefeller implemented them. These habits dramatically increase profitability and reduce the time it takes to manage the business."
— Verne Harnish, Scaling Up, 第1章
I — 方法论骨架 (Interpretation)
Rockefeller Habits是一套100年不过时的执行习惯体系，源于John D. Rockefeller的管理实践。
为什么叫"Rockefeller"？ 因为这套习惯在Rockefeller（1910年代）时期就已被验证有效——那时候没有电脑、没有OKR、没有敏捷开发，但这些习惯依然管用。说明它们触及的是人类协作的本质，不受时代限制。
10大习惯分为3类：
A. 组织层习惯（顶楼设计）
- 高管团队健康且对齐
- 核心价值观和使命"活着"
B. 战略层习惯（方向锁定） 3. 所有人对齐季度第一优先事项 4. 员工能准确表述公司战略
C. 执行层习惯（日常运转） 5. 沟通节奏建立，信息准确快速流动 6. 每个职能/流程有人负责 7. 持续收集员工输入识别障碍 8. 客户反馈数据与财务数据同样频繁 9. 所有员工可量化是否度过了好的一天/周 10. 公司计划和绩效对所有人可见
关键约束： 不要同时推行全部10个。每次只选1-2个，聚焦24-36个月，再进入下一轮。
A1 — 书中的应用 (Past Application)
案例1: Rockefeller Habits救了Express-Med
- 问题: Alan Rudy在1999年面临$350,000亏损、员工冲突、每周80小时工作
- 方法论的使用: 引入Rockefeller Habits，包括晨站会、财务追踪、季度优先事项
- 结论: 两年内从危机企业变成$6500万行业龙头
- 结果: 成功出售公司获得$4000万
案例2: Rackspace的Rockefeller Habits文化
- 问题: 如何在快速招聘中保持文化一致性？
- 方法论的使用: Rackspace将Rockefeller Habits融入每周全员会议和季度OKR
- 结论: 52,000人申请569个职位，招聘质量极高
- 结果: 连续多年入选《财富》最佳雇主前30
案例3: 习惯执行的"季度轮换"原则
- 问题: 为什么很多公司尝试Rockefeller Habits但失败了？
- 方法论的使用: 一次只推1-2个习惯，给团队充分消化时间
- 结论: 欲速则不达——每个习惯需要24-36个月才能真正成为组织DNA
- 结果: 那些着急推全部10个的公司最终全部失败
A2 — 触发场景 (Future Trigger) ★
用户会在什么情境下需要这个skill？
- 团队说"我们开了很多会但没有结果" — 有会议但缺乏结构，没有节奏感
- 战略定了但执行总跑偏 — 年度计划在书架上积灰，季度末回顾发现什么都没做
- 员工不知道公司方向 — 问员工"我们的BHAG是什么"，没人答得出来
- 团队每天在救火 — 没有优先级概念，什么都紧急
- 文化在Scaling时稀释 — 公司从30人扩到100人，文化变得散乱
- 数据只用来看历史 — 财务数据月度才出，没人用它做日常决策
语言信号（用户的话里出现这些就应激活）
- "我们有太多会但没结果"
- "为什么计划总是完不成"
- "员工不知道我们在做什么"
- "我们需要节奏感"
- "日站会怎么开"
- "周会怎么开"
- "如何让战略上下对齐"
- "数据怎么追踪"
- "我们总是在救火"
与相邻skill的区分
- 与
routine-sets-you-free的区别: "Routine Sets You Free"是哲学，Rockefeller Habits是这个哲学的10个具体操作习惯。前者解释为什么，后者告诉你做什么。 - 与
meeting-rhythm的区别: 会议节奏只是Rockefeller Habits的3个之一（习惯3/5/10）。完整的Rockefeller Habits还包括优先级对齐、文化激活、数据追踪等。
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 175 lines · 99 tokens per session scan A 79fda7b23d68
rockefeller-habits is a skill published in the GitHub repository ace3000chao/book2startup (80 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 99 tokens to every session and 2,302 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
smart-goals
Converts vague objectives into Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound goals. Provides structure for cascading company-level objectives into team-level commitments with accountability. Use when translating founder vision into execution milestones, aligning departments around shared metrics…
design-honest-record-keeping
Use when designing or auditing your organization's documentation practices — to establish institutional norms for recording events, failures, and decisions accurately and without euphemism, because institutions that record reality honestly have better learning loops and accountability than those that soften or omit…
design-raci-matrix
Use when a task, process, or decision has unclear ownership — multiple people assuming someone else is handling it, or no one being sure who has final authority — mapping every significant activity to exactly one Responsible party, one Accountable party, and explicitly defined Consulted and Informed parties, rather…
dag-ops
Operations, debugging, and optimization for DAG workflows. Performs root cause analysis on failures, profiles execution performance, aggregates results from parallel branches, bridges context between nodes, and learns patterns from execution history. Activate on "DAG failed", "why did it fail", "root cause"…
goal-tracker
OKR-style goal tracking for solopreneurs — quarterly goals, weekly check-ins, progress scoring, and an AI accountability partner that flags drift before it becomes failure.
habit-tracker
Daily habit tracking skill for solopreneurs. Use when tracking recurring behaviors (writing, exercise, outreach, deep work), checking in on streaks, logging habit completions, reviewing weekly averages, or setting up automated habit accountability via heartbeat or cron. Distinct from goal-tracker: habits are daily…