Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server --skill task-planninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-planning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-planning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server/task-planning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00111 | $0.01915 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00766 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00383 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
task-planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Planning
规划不是猜测,是分析需求 → 定义蓝图 → 拆解可执行任务 → 建立可验证的验收标准。本技能与 [[task-traceability]] 协作,确保每次规划产出清晰、可执行、可追溯——每个任务都可追溯到具体需求。
何时触发
- Leader 分配新的需求/目标给 Planner
- 用户说"分析一下这个需求"、"拆解任务"、"制定执行计划"
- 新的工作周期开始,需要产出任务列表
- 现有蓝图需要修订或补充
规划六步法
按顺序执行,每一步通过才进入下一步。任一步产出不清晰 → 回退澄清。
1. 读取需求上下文
定位并理解需求来源:
- 如果是 Leader 通过 orchestrator 分配的需求,通过
claude-orchestrator get-context --key <需求key>获取 - 如果是本地文档(如
docs/pm/YYYY-MM-DD/),读取完整内容 - 如果是代码库需求(如 Issue、PR 描述),读取相关文档和代码
提取关键信息:
- 业务目标和背景
- 约束条件和边界
- 期望的交付标准和截止时间
2. 定义任务蓝图
输出蓝图文档,包含以下要素:
# 任务蓝图:[目标名称]
> Planner | YYYY-MM-DD | 版本 v1
## 目标
(一句话描述要达成什么)
## 背景
(为什么需要做这个,解决什么问题)
## 范围与非范围
**范围内:**
- 具体要做的事项 1
- 具体要做的事项 2
**不在范围内:**
- 明确不做的事项 1
## 约束条件
- 技术约束(如必须兼容 Node.js 18+)
- 时间约束
- 依赖约束(如依赖外部服务 X 先就绪)
## 成功定义
(可验证的成功标准,不是抽象描述)
- 标准 1:所有单元测试通过,覆盖率 ≥ X%
- 标准 2:UI 交互流程可在浏览器中完成
- ...
3. 拆解可执行任务
将蓝图拆解为独立的任务项。每个任务必须满足:
- 可独立执行:Builder 无需频繁跨任务上下文切换
- 可验证:有明确的验收标准(测试命令、UI 检查点、文件路径等)
- 有产出物:代码变更、测试报告、截图、文档等
## 任务清单
| # | 任务 | 类型 | 验收标准 | 预估 | 依赖 |
|---|------|------|---------|------|------|
| 1 | 实现 XXX 模块 | build | `npm test -- XXX` 全部通过 | 2h | - |
| 2 | 编写 YYY 集成测试 | build | `npm test -- YYY` 覆盖 3 个场景 | 1h | #1 |
| 3 | 验证 ZZZ 边界情况 | verify | 运行边界测试套件,0 失败 | 0.5h | #2 |
| 4 | 审查整体方案一致性 | review | 审查报告无 P0/P1 问题 | 0.5h | #2, #3 |
| 5 | 验收最终交付物 | accept | 对照验收标准逐项通过 | 0.5h | #4 |
任务类型对应责任链环节:plan / build / verify / review / accept。
依赖字段确保责任链顺序:P → B → V → R → A。
4. 推入任务队列
通过 orchestrator 将任务推入队列,指定每个任务的责任链环节:
# Build 任务
claude-orchestrator push-task \
--title "实现 XXX 模块" \
--link build \
--priority 0
# Verify 任务
claude-orchestrator push-task \
--title "验证 ZZZ 边界情况" \
--link verify \
--priority 1
# Review 任务
claude-orchestrator push-task \
--title "审查整体方案一致性" \
--link review \
--priority 1
# Accept 任务
claude-orchestrator push-task \
--title "验收最终交付物" \
--link accept \
--priority 1
优先级建议:plan 和下游瓶颈任务用 0(HIGH),其余用 1(MEDIUM)。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 189 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A 7546f448e7f8
task-planning is a skill published in the GitHub repository adamancyzhang/claude-orchestrator-server (2 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 1,915 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-11.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.